These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6376589)
1. Restoration of cervical contours on nonprepared teeth using glass ionomer cement: a 4 1/2-year report. Brandau HE; Ziemiecki TL; Charbeneau GT J Am Dent Assoc; 1984 May; 108(5):782-3. PubMed ID: 6376589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement for restoration of cervical erosion. Charbeneau GT; Bozell RR J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Jun; 98(6):936-9. PubMed ID: 379095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results. Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of a glass ionomer cement restorative. Seluk LW; Smith FW J Mich Dent Assoc; 1981 Apr; 63(4):265-7. PubMed ID: 6941027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Composite resin and glass-ionomer cement: current status for use in cervical restorations. Brackett WW; Robinson PB Quintessence Int; 1990 Jun; 21(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 2243948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations. Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study. Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Restorations of eroded areas. Mount GJ J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Jan; 120(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 2404041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How finishing affects glass ionomers. Results of a five-year evaluation. Matis BA; Carlson T; Cochran M; Phillips RW J Am Dent Assoc; 1991 Jul; 122(7):43-6. PubMed ID: 1861011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glass ionomer cement: the material of choice for erosion lesions? Brackett WW J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1983; 62(3):15-7. PubMed ID: 6577068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations. Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Increasing the resistance of teeth to fracture: bonded composite resin versus glass ionomer cement. Eakle WS Dent Mater; 1985 Dec; 1(6):229-30. PubMed ID: 3913610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Restoration of cervical erosions and abrasions]. Kakamboura A Odontostomatol Proodos; 1986 Jun; 40(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 3095749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Glass-ionomer-resin restoration of primary molars with adjacent Class II carious lesions. Croll TP; Killian CM Quintessence Int; 1993 Oct; 24(10):723-7. PubMed ID: 8121987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Ermiş RB Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements and microfilled composite resins in the treatment of cervical lesions of the teeth (confirmed with scanning electron microscopy). Shahani DR; Kolwalkar NS J Indian Dent Assoc; 1986 Jan; 58(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 3457864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Glass ionomer as a luting material. Christensen GJ J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Jan; 120(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 2404045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]