These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6376740)

  • 1. The effect of ultrasonic scaling on the surface of Class V amalgam restorations--a scanning electron microscopy study.
    Rajstein J; Tal M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 May; 11(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 6376740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of ultrasonic cleaning and air polishing on the marginal integrity of radicular amalgam and composite resin restorations. An in vitro study.
    Gorfil C; Nordenberg D; Liberman R; Ben-Amar A
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Mar; 16(3):137-9. PubMed ID: 2656763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal integrity of amalgam restorations.
    Leidal TI; Dahl JE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1980; 38(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 6929645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study).
    Kamel FM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [SEM observation of the effect of ultrasonic scaling on the enamel surface (author's transl)].
    Huang ZR
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Ke Za Zhi; 1982; 17(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 7049620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The effect of ultrasonic dental calculus removal on amalgam fillings].
    Hohenwald R; Westermann H; Dermann K
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1987 Feb; 42(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 3552610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scanning electron microscope study of marginal adaptation of amalgam in restoration finishing techniques.
    Chan KC; Edie JW; Svare CW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Aug; 38(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 268427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in understanding the influence of ultrasonic dental scaling on the dental structure-dental filling interface.
    Andrei M; Pirvu C; Demetrescu I
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2014 Dec; 122(6):411-6. PubMed ID: 25371134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of marginal leakage of Class 2 combined amalgam-composite restorations.
    Eidelman E; Holan G; Tanzer-Sarneh S; Chosack A
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 2216907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth.
    Eakle WS; Staninec M; Lacy AM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):257-60. PubMed ID: 1501170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Study of microleakage at Class I cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser using three types of restorative materials.
    Khan MF; Yonaga K; Kimura Y; Funato A; Matsumoto K
    J Clin Laser Med Surg; 1998 Dec; 16(6):305-8. PubMed ID: 10204435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The periodontal curet and the ultrasonic scaler. Their effectiveness in removing overhangs from amalgam restorations.
    Blanchard JS
    Dent Hyg (Chic); 1984 Oct; 58(10):450-4. PubMed ID: 6386552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations: a combined in vivo and in vitro study.
    Di Lenarda R; Cadenaro M; Gregorig G; De Stefano Dorigo E
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 11317396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Marginal defects in amalgam fillings after the use of 2 intermediate substances].
    Zimmer J
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1993; 103(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8430283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bonded amalgam restorations: a comparative study of glass-ionomer and resin adhesives.
    al-Moayad M; Aboush YE; Elderton RJ
    Br Dent J; 1993 Nov; 175(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 8257646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal fracture of posterior composite resins.
    Fukushima M; Setcos JC; Phillips RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Oct; 117(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 3066806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasonic root planing.
    Pearlman BA
    Aust Dent J; 1982 Apr; 27(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 7052038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal seal composition in amalgam restored teeth of varying marginal leakage.
    Grossman ES; Witcomb MJ; Matejka JM
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1997 Mar; 52(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 9461907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.