These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6376757)

  • 1. The effect of surface adsorption and staining reactions on the antimicrobial properties of some cationic antiseptic mouthwashes.
    Moran J; Addy M
    J Periodontol; 1984 May; 55(5):278-82. PubMed ID: 6376757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the in vivo and in vitro antibacterial properties of antiseptic mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine, alexidine, cetyl pyridinium chloride and hexetidine. Relevance to mode of action.
    Roberts WR; Addy M
    J Clin Periodontol; 1981 Aug; 8(4):295-310. PubMed ID: 6947993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of polymethylmethacrylate to compare the adsorption and staining reactions of some cationic antiseptics.
    Addy M; Roberts WR
    J Periodontol; 1981 Jul; 52(7):380-5. PubMed ID: 6942154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The formation of stain on acrylic surfaces by the interaction of cationic antiseptic mouthwashes and tea.
    Addy M; Moran J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1984; 18(6):631-41. PubMed ID: 6085797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [In vitro bacteriocidal activity of 5 oral antiseptics against the principal microorganisms implicated in oral disease].
    Luc J; Roques C; Frayret MN; Michel G; Ducani M; Vandermander J
    J Parodontol; 1991 Nov; 10(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 1811047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An approach to efficacy screening of mouthrinses: studies on a group of French products (I). Staining and antimicrobial properties in vitro.
    Addy M; Wade W
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Sep; 22(9):718-22. PubMed ID: 7593703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dietary staining in vitro by mouthrinses as a comparative measure of antiseptic activity and predictor of staining in vivo.
    Addy M; Mahdavi SA; Loyn T
    J Dent; 1995 Apr; 23(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 7738271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The pattern of adsorption of cationic antiseptics to polymethylmethacrylate.
    Moran J; Addy M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1985 Jan; 12(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 3857313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro study to assess the efficacy of antiplaque agents in mouthwash formulations.
    Frost MR; Harris MP
    Microbios; 1994; 79(319):101-8. PubMed ID: 7526132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Staining and antimicrobial properties in vitro of some chlorhexidine formulations.
    Addy M; Wade W; Goodfield S
    Clin Prev Dent; 1991 Jan; 13(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 1860282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro antifungal properties of mouthrinses containing antimicrobial agents.
    Giuliana G; Pizzo G; Milici ME; Musotto GC; Giangreco R
    J Periodontol; 1997 Aug; 68(8):729-33. PubMed ID: 9287062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibitory effects of antiseptic mouthrinses on Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis and Lactobacillus acidophilus.
    Evans A; Leishman SJ; Walsh LJ; Seow WK
    Aust Dent J; 2015 Jun; 60(2):247-54; quiz 270. PubMed ID: 25989101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Susceptibilities of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans biofilms to oral antiseptics.
    Thrower Y; Pinney RJ; Wilson M
    J Med Microbiol; 1997 May; 46(5):425-9. PubMed ID: 9152040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The inhibitory effect of antiseptic mouthwash solutions on bacterial growth in dental plaque and saliva].
    Plagmann HC; Schwardmann F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Jul; 40(7):806-10. PubMed ID: 3868590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of toothpaste on the propensity of chlorhexidine and cetyl pyridinium chloride to produce staining in vitro: a possible predictor of inactivation.
    Sheen S; Owens J; Addy M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 11142666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mouthrinses: a comparative microbiological study.
    Gautier G; Noguer M; Costa N; Canela J; Viñas M
    Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 2000; 42(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 11799736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Bacteriocidal activity of 3 mouthwashes using the Afnor NF T. 72-150 standard].
    Mathieu C; Schwartzbrod L; Rozencweig D
    Chir Dent Fr; 1984 Jan; 54(234):43-5. PubMed ID: 6586405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro activities of antimicrobial agents against Candida species.
    Giuliana G; Pizzo G; Milici ME; Giangreco R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 9927079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the in vivo and in vitro antibacterial properties of providone iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinses.
    Addy M; Wright R
    J Clin Periodontol; 1978 Aug; 5(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 279548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro oral biofilm model for comparing the efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses.
    Shapiro S; Giertsen E; Guggenheim B
    Caries Res; 2002; 36(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 12037365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.