BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6376782)

  • 1. Evaluation of reversible hydrocolloid impression material in a wet field.
    Stewart GP; Bagley RL; Froemling RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Jun; 51(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 6376782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy of combined reversible and irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials.
    Supowitz ML; Schnell RJ; Dykema RW; Goodacre CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Apr; 59(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 3283324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of disposable and custom-made impression trays on the accuracy of impressions.
    Burton JF; Hood JA; Plunkett DJ; Johnson SS
    J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):121-3. PubMed ID: 2671076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinically oriented evaluation of the accuracy of commonly used impression materials.
    Tjan AH; Whang SB; Tjan AH; Sarkissian R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jul; 56(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 3522878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Impression and model materials, a functional unit].
    Finger W; Lockowandt P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Jul; 27(7):620-4. PubMed ID: 4557300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a rubber-base impression material.
    Gunther G; Welsh SI
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Jan; 39(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 340664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of a hydrophilic irreversible hydrocolloid/silicone impression material.
    Davis DR; Preble JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Mar; 55(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 3514871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
    Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of a combined reversible/irreversible hydrocolloid impression system with other commonly used impression materials.
    Herring HW; Tames MA; Zardiackas LD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Dec; 52(6):795-9. PubMed ID: 6392511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The accuracy of post-impressions with silicone-rubber impression materials and polysulfide-rubber impression materials].
    Aoyama S; Sano Y; Enomoto M; Hanamura N
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1980 Jun; 6(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 6935848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Studies on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. Part 2. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of casts made by both single polyether rubber impression and the combined reversible and irreversible hydrocolloid impression technique (author's transl)].
    Shigeto N; Inohara N; Yamada S
    Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1978; 10(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 396327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [EXPERIMENTAL COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE DIMENSIONAL STABILITY OF 4 GROUPS OF DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS].
    BACHMANN J
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1965 Apr; 75():434-73. PubMed ID: 14280767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The combined reversible hydrocolloid/irreversible hydrocolloid impression system: clinical application.
    Appleby DC; Cohen SR; Racowsky LP; Mingledorff EB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jul; 46(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 7024517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Accuracy of post impression in various directions. Combined reversible/irreversible hydrocolloid impression].
    Warita K
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1987 Aug; 31(4):997-1010. PubMed ID: 3333583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impression procedures for restorative dentistry.
    Brown MH
    Dent Clin North Am; 1967 Mar; ():147-61. PubMed ID: 5334351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of cervical discrepancy of gold crowns in stone dies from various impression materials].
    Mantovani AV; Stephano CB; Roselino RF; Roselino RB; Campos GM
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 2135328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impression materials and techniques used for cast restorations in eight states.
    Shillingburg HT; Hatch RA; Keenan MP; Hemphill MW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1980 May; 100(5):696-9. PubMed ID: 6988492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A laminated hydrocolloid impression for indirect inlays.
    Fusayama T; Kurosaki N; Node H; Nakamura M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1982 Feb; 47(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 7035653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ability of various impression materials to produce duplicate dies from successive impressions.
    Morgano SM; Milot P; Ducharme P; Rose L
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 7783010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.