These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6376782)

  • 21. [Comparison of castings obtained using 2 impression materials. Van-R reversible hydrocolloid and vinyl polysiloxane 3M Express].
    Zemella A
    Dent Cadmos; 1986 Nov; 54(17):81-8. PubMed ID: 3556232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. New irreversible hydrocolloid silicone impression material.
    Eames WB; Litvak CS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):479-84. PubMed ID: 6594507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A new impression material for impressions of single prepared teeth destined to be covered with gold].
    Landt H
    DDZ; 1968 Jan; 22(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 4866941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An effect of tray design and material retention on the linear dimensional changes in polysulfide impressions.
    Walters RA; Spurrier S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 2407824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy and bond strength of reversible with irreversible hydrocolloid impression systems: a comparative study.
    Heisler WH; Tjan AH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):578-84. PubMed ID: 1403933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The combined reversible hydrocolloid/irreversible hydrocolloid impression system.
    Appleby DC; Pameijer CH; Boffa J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Jul; 44(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 6991676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Occlusal accuracy of casts made and articulated differently.
    Peregrina A; Reisbick MH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Apr; 63(4):422-5. PubMed ID: 2184226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of disinfection on irreversible hydrocolloid and alternative impression materials and the resultant gypsum casts.
    Suprono MS; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Winer MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 23031732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The persistence of microorganisms on impression materials following disinfection.
    Jennings KJ; Samaranayake LP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(4):382-7. PubMed ID: 1811634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating dimensional accuracy of stone models.
    Hosoda H; Ohsawa M
    J Dent Res; 1979 Apr; 58(4):1352-7. PubMed ID: 285105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of impression-die systems on crown margins.
    Plekavich EJ; Joncas JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Jun; 49(6):772-6. PubMed ID: 6348258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. New reversible hydrocolloid for recording the retracted gingival sulcus in fixed prosthodontics: laboratory and clinical evaluation.
    Engelman MA; Kessler H; McEvoy R
    N Y J Dent; 1980; 50(7):151-62. PubMed ID: 6997781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dimensional stability and accuracy of rubber impression materials.
    Henry PJ; Harnist DJ
    Aust Dent J; 1974 Jun; 19(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 4611404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of silver-plated and stone dies from rubber-base impressions.
    Cooney JP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Sep; 32(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 4612140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Efficacy of tray adhesives for the adhesion of elastomer rubber impression materials to impression modeling plastics for border molding.
    Nishigawa G; Sato T; Suenaga K; Minagi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 9513098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Immersion disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions in pH-adjusted sodium hypochlorite. Part 2: Effect on gypsum casts.
    Hutchings ML; Vandewalle KS; Schwartz RS; Charlton DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 8957856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Immersion disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impression in pH-adjusted sodium hypochlorite. Part 1: Microbiology.
    Schwartz RS; Hensley DH; Bradley DV
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 8957855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Disinfection procedures: their efficacy and effect on dimensional accuracy and surface quality of an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Rentzia A; Coleman DC; O'Donnell MJ; Dowling AH; O'Sullivan M
    J Dent; 2011 Feb; 39(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 21093528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Removal time: a factor in the accuracy of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Khaknegar B; Ettinger RL
    J Oral Rehabil; 1977 Oct; 4(4):369-76. PubMed ID: 335032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of material bulk and undercuts on the accuracy of impression materials.
    de Araujo PA; Jorgensen KD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Dec; 54(6):791-4. PubMed ID: 3908659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.