These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6376782)
41. Check bite impressions using irreversible alginate/reversible hydrocolloid combination. Scott GK; Hawkins L; Chetwyn J; Doughty T J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jan; 77(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 9029470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. An update on elastomeric impression materials. Brown D Br Dent J; 1981 Jan; 150(2):35-40. PubMed ID: 7006650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. [Adhesion of polysulfide rubber impression material to dental metals (author's transl)]. Kawai T; Iwata T; Nishimoto K; Aida Y; Aoki Y; Yamauchi M; Hasegawa J Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1982 Jan; 23(61):40-6. PubMed ID: 7042866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Simplified techniques for the preparation and use of reversible hydrocolloid impression material. Campagni WV; Rivera S; Davidoff SR J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Aug; 54(2):167-9. PubMed ID: 3903108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Effect of impression materials and techniques on the marginal fit of metal castings. Gelbard S; Aoskar Y; Zalkind M; Stern N J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jan; 71(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8120837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [A new impression material for the casting of individual gold restorations]. Landt H Odontol Foren Tidskr; 1966 Dec; 30(4):295-318. PubMed ID: 5335043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. [Reproduction of the spacing of bridge abutments by reversible hydrocolloid]. Lehmann KM; Behrend G Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1984 Nov; 39(11):876-9. PubMed ID: 6397353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of stone casts poured from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. Mendez AJ J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 3906093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Comparative study using scanning electron microscopy on the precision of the cervical margins of complete crowns in relation to the different materials and methods used in impression taking]. Beltrame A G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1984; 3(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 6399505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. A comparison of elastic impression materials. Stackhouse JA J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Sep; 34(3):305-13. PubMed ID: 22334993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. [Surfaces of stone models made in elastic material impression. II. Stone model surfaces set against synthetic rubber impressions]. Daito K Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1972 Dec; 39(4):597-610. PubMed ID: 4513389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]