These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
69. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations. Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Reversible hydrocolloid: the standard of excellence. Nemetz H; Tjan AH J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Sep; 60(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 3050044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models. Johnson GH; Craig RG J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Apr; 53(4):484-90. PubMed ID: 3889281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Adhesion between copper-plated acrylic tray resin and a polysulfide rubber impression material. Shigeto N; Kawazoe Y; Hamada T; Yamada S J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Aug; 42(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 379322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions. Tjan AH; Nemetz H; Nguyen LT; Contino R J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 1403906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. A method for using reversible hydrocolloid at high altitudes. Fine TD; Ito RJ; Christensen GJ; Cunningham PR J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Sep; 38(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 333100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Reversible agar agar hydrocolloid. Reed HV Quintessence Int; 1990 Mar; 21(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 2197671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]