These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6377032)

  • 1. A photodiode array x-ray imaging system for digital angiography.
    Cunningham IA; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 6377032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A scanning x-ray imaging system for quantitative arteriography and blood flow measurements.
    Fenster A; Cunningham IA; Hobbs BB
    Med Instrum; 1986; 20(4):173-81. PubMed ID: 3762450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new system for quantitative arterial imaging and blood flow measurements.
    Cunningham IA; Hobbs BB; Fenster A
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Jun; 21(6):465-71. PubMed ID: 3721803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scanning-beam digital x-ray (SBDX) technology for interventional and diagnostic cardiac angiography.
    Speidel MA; Wilfley BP; Star-Lack JM; Heanue JA; Van Lysel MS
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2714-27. PubMed ID: 16964847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
    Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of entrance exposure and signal-to-noise ratio between an SBDX prototype and a wide-beam cardiac angiographic system.
    Speidel MA; Wilfley BP; Star-Lack JM; Heanue JA; Betts TD; Van Lysel MS
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2728-43. PubMed ID: 16964848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of vessel contrast measured with a scanning-beam digital x-ray system and an image intensifier/television system.
    Speidel MA; Wilfley BP; Heanue JA; Betts TD; Van Lysel MS
    Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 11243348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-resolution digital x-ray detector utilizing a discrete array of CdWO4 scintillators and a self-scanned photodiode array.
    Fritz SL; Cook LT
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 3587147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital subtraction angiography system evaluation with phantoms.
    Wenstrup RS; Sweeney KP; Scholz FJ
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):805-9. PubMed ID: 3890013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A fast low-noise line scan x-ray detector.
    Glüer CC; Dix WR; Engelke K; Graeff W; Kupper W; Stellmaschek KH
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 2921989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A time-delay integration charge-coupled device camera for slot-scanned digital radiography.
    Holdsworth DW; Gerson RK; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(5):876-86. PubMed ID: 2233575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Method for measuring the focal spot size of an x-ray tube using a coded aperture mask and a digital detector.
    Russo P; Mettivier G
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2099-115. PubMed ID: 21626943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital radiographic imaging system with multiple-slit scanning x-ray beam: preliminary report.
    Doi K; Fujita H; Ohara K; Ono K; Matsui H; Giger ML; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1986 Nov; 161(2):513-8. PubMed ID: 3763924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scanned-projection digital mammography.
    Nishikawa RM; Mawdsley GE; Fenster A; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(5):717-27. PubMed ID: 3683300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noise in stenosis measurement using digital subtraction angiography.
    Wright GA; Taylor KW; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(6):705-12. PubMed ID: 3908890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging.
    Baba R; Ueda K; Okabe M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15585803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system.
    Palma BA; Rosado-Méndez I; Villaseñor Y; Brandan ME
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):577-89. PubMed ID: 20229866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications.
    Granfors PR; Aufrichtig R; Possin GE; Giambattista BW; Huang ZS; Liu J; Ma B
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2715-26. PubMed ID: 14596310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
    Samant SS; Gopal A
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.