These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6377470)

  • 1. Evaluation of Minitec and API as rapid diagnostic methods for anaerobic bacteria.
    Bergan T; Vangdal M; Salveson A
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1984; 91():103-11. PubMed ID: 6377470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anaerobic identification systems.
    Rosenblatt JE
    Clin Lab Med; 1985 Mar; 5(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 4017512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of API-10s and Minitek with conventional biochemical tests (author's transl)].
    Stanek G; Hirschl A; Rotter M
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Feb; 246(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 6999781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.
    Appelbaum PC; Kaufmann CS; Keifer JC; Venbrux HJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):614-21. PubMed ID: 6355150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of systems for anaerobe identification.
    Sessa R; Di Pietro M; del Piano M
    Ann Ig; 1996; 8(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 9177081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptation of a coculture technique to the Minitek anaerobe system.
    Hussain Z; Lannigan R; Bürger H; Groves D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):645-6. PubMed ID: 3886697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of API ZYM system with API AN-Ident, API 20A, Minitek Anaerobe II, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of Clostridium difficile.
    Head CB; Ratnam S
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Jan; 26(1):144-6. PubMed ID: 3277989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of API and Minitek to Center for Disease Control methods for the biochemical characterization of anaerobes.
    Hansen SL; Stewart BJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Sep; 4(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid enzymatic characterization of clinically encountered anaerobic bacteria with the API ZYM system.
    Marler L; Allen S; Siders J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Aug; 3(4):294-300. PubMed ID: 6386457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mastroeni P; Carbone M; Fera MT; Teti G
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of RapID-ANA and Minitek with a conventional method for biochemical identification of anaerobes.
    Hussain Z; Lannigan R; Schieven BC; Stoakes L; Kelly T; Groves D
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 May; 7(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 3319374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Biochemical characterization of haemophilus-strains by using the API 20 E- and API 50e-testsystem (author's transl)].
    Holländer R
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1981 Sep; 250(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 7029968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Minitek Anaerobe II, API An-Ident, and RapID ANA systems for identification of Clostridium difficile.
    Bate G
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Jun; 85(6):716-8. PubMed ID: 3518405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Experiences with the API 20A system in routine species identification of anaerobes (author's transl)].
    Essers L; Haralambie E
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1977 Jul; 238(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 333828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current issues and problems in dealing with anaerobes in the clinical laboratory.
    Allen SD; Siders JA; Marler LM
    Clin Lab Med; 1995 Jun; 15(2):333-64. PubMed ID: 7671577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Karachewski NO; Busch EL; Wells CL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 21(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 3881468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of anaerobes on the Minitek System, compared to a conventional system.
    Holloway Y; Dankert J
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1979; 245(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 44787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of Pasteurella multocida and Pasteurella haemolytica by API 20E, Minitek, and Oxi/Ferm systems.
    Collins MT; Weaver N; Ellis RP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 7016894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of commercial test systems for the identification of nonfermenters.
    Lampe AS; van der Reijden TJ
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Aug; 3(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 6386458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in the API 20E biochemical patterns of clinical and environmental Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates.
    Martinez-Urtaza J; Lozano-Leon A; Viña-Feas A; de Novoa J; Garcia-Martin O
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2006 Feb; 255(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 16436064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.