These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6377747)

  • 1. [Impression material trays and models in dental technology].
    Ulber G
    Zahntechnik (Berl); 1983 Dec; 24(12):521-4. PubMed ID: 6377747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accurate dies and well-fitting crowns using three-in-one, all-plastic impression trays.
    Gottlieb M
    Dent Econ; 1996 Jan; 86(1):102-3. PubMed ID: 8612944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Dimensional differences in stone casts from trays made of different materials].
    Pamir AD
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1987 May; 14(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 3331548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elastic impressions using custom acrylic trays.
    Tosti A
    Dent Dig; 1969 Mar; 75(3):94-7. PubMed ID: 4886025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impression success using the dual arch technique.
    Small BW
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(6):396-7. PubMed ID: 16366044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of using custom or stock trays on the accuracy of gypsum casts.
    Rueda LJ; Sy-Muñoz JT; Naylor WP; Goodacre CJ; Swartz ML
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 8957875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 19418862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simple technique for making custom impression trays.
    Leknius C; Henderson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):371. PubMed ID: 11005915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty?
    Garg AK
    Dent Implantol Update; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18399300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Considerations for adhesion of impression materials to impression trays.
    Bomberg TJ; Goldfogel MH; Hoffman W; Bomberg SE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Dec; 60(6):681-4. PubMed ID: 3060600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Impression of tooth-containing jaws by individual trays].
    Marxkors R
    ZWR; 1978 Jul; 87(14):682-4. PubMed ID: 354261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.