194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6377750)
1. [A simple wash technic for the recovery of test pathogens in the evaluation of surface disinfection procedures].
Koller W
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1984 May; 179(2):112-24. PubMed ID: 6377750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Viable bacterial counts by agar-droplet technique (author's transl)].
Koller W; Jelinek JA
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1976 Aug; 235(4):527-53. PubMed ID: 790859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid surface colony counts determination with three new miniaturised techniques.
Malik KA
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1977; 237(2-3):415-23. PubMed ID: 322428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Problems associated with traditional hygiene swabbing: the need for in-house standardization.
Moore G; Griffith C
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 103(4):1090-103. PubMed ID: 17897214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts.
Augustin JC; Carlier V
Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 23(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 16942983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of different sampling techniques and enumeration methods for the isolation and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in raw retail chicken legs.
Scherer K; Bartelt E; Sommerfeld C; Hildebrandt G
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 108(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 16545475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduction of bacterial surface contamination in the hospital environment by application of a new product with persistent effect.
Hedin G; Rynbäck J; Loré B
J Hosp Infect; 2010 Jun; 75(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 20381907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
Lindblad M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enumeration of heterotrophs, fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli in water: comparison of 3M Petrifilm plates with standard plating procedures.
Schraft H; Watterworth LA
J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Mar; 60(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 15649535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of an innovative method for the evaluation of fungal contamination of surfaces.
Vescia N; D'Alessandro D; Osborn JF; Grillot R
Ann Ig; 2008; 20(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18478671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two non-invasive methods of microbial analysis in surgery practice: incision swabbing and the indirect imprint technique.
Chovanec Z; Veverkova L; Votava M; Svoboda J; Jedlicka V; Capov I
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Dec; 15(6):786-93. PubMed ID: 25478933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity of Escherichia coli O157 detection in bovine feces assessed by broth enrichment followed by immunomagnetic separation and direct plating methodologies.
LeJeune JT; Hancock DD; Besser TE
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):872-5. PubMed ID: 16517869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of procedures for hygienic disinfection of hands: comparison of two methods, for artificially contaminating hands and use of an automatic colony-counter (author's transl)].
Koller W; Rotter M; Kundi M
Zentralbl Bakteriol B; 1978 Aug; 167(1-2):38-47. PubMed ID: 362775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of 4 methods of bacterial count determination in burn wounds].
Winkler M; Erbs G; König W; Müller FE
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A; 1987 Jun; 265(1-2):82-98. PubMed ID: 3314260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Assessment of bacterial counts in the meat-processing industry. II. The plate-loop method and the droplet method (author's transl)].
Gerats GE; Snijders JM
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1977 Aug; 102(16):975-82. PubMed ID: 329470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The enumeration of chlorine-injured Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis is enhanced under conditions where reactive oxygen species are neutralized.
Tandon P; Chhibber S; Reed RH
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 44(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 17209818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Development of a new testmethod for surface disinfection procedures. III. The impression method: influence of the test surface material and the types of microorganisms on the recovery rate (author's transl)].
Werner H-P ; Swinke U; Werner G
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B; 1977 Sep; 165(1):20-42. PubMed ID: 412353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of media for enumeration of coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli in non-disinfected water.
Pitkänen T; Paakkari P; Miettinen IT; Heinonen-Tanski H; Paulin L; Hänninen ML
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Mar; 68(3):522-9. PubMed ID: 17150268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New technique to take samples from environmental surfaces using flocked nylon swabs.
Hedin G; Rynbäck J; Loré B
J Hosp Infect; 2010 Aug; 75(4):314-7. PubMed ID: 20451296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
