These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6377863)

  • 1. An evaluation of the precision and accuracy of the direct transfer method for the analysis of asbestos fibers with comparison to the NIOSH method.
    Pang TW; Dicker WL; Nazar MA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 May; 45(5):329-35. PubMed ID: 6377863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the phase contrast microscopy method for the detection of fibrous and other elongated mineral particulates by comparison with a STEM technique.
    Snyder JG; Virta RL; Segreti JM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 May; 48(5):471-7. PubMed ID: 3035911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of membrane filters used for TEM analysis of asbestos.
    Webber JS; Czuhanich AG; Carhart LJ
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Oct; 4(10):780-9. PubMed ID: 17763069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of direct and indirect methods of measuring airborne chrysotile fibre concentration.
    Eypert-Blaison C; Veissiere S; Rastoix O; Kauffer E
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Jan; 54(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 19812231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing milled fiber, Quebec ore, and textile factory dust: has another piece of the asbestos puzzle fallen into place?
    Berman DW
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010; 40(2):151-88. PubMed ID: 20085481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A meta-analysis of asbestos-related cancer risk that addresses fiber size and mineral type.
    Berman DW; Crump KS
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2008; 38 Suppl 1():49-73. PubMed ID: 18686078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of mounting methods for the evaluation of fibers by phase contrast microscopy.
    Lee EG; Pang TW; Nelson J; Andrew M; Harper M
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):644-57. PubMed ID: 21642614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency of sampling and analysis of asbestos fibers on filter media: implications for exposure assessment.
    Vallero DA; Kominsky JR; Beard ME; Crankshaw OS
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Jan; 6(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 19037817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Airborne asbestos concentrations associated with heavy equipment brake removal.
    Madl AK; Gaffney SH; Balzer JL; Paustenbach DJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Nov; 53(8):839-57. PubMed ID: 19692501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Inter-laboratory comparison of measuring concentration of asbestos fibers less than 5 microM in length using phase-contrast microscopy].
    Camilucci L; Campopiano A
    Med Lav; 1998; 89(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 9847537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A study of airborne chrysotile concentrations associated with handling, unpacking, and repacking boxes of automobile clutch discs.
    Jiang GC; Madl AK; Ingmundson KJ; Murbach DM; Fehling KA; Paustenbach DJ; Finley BL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jun; 51(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 18440685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Asbestos fibers in alcoholic beverages. Contaminating role of filtration material].
    le Bouffant L
    Ann Nutr Aliment; 1978; 32(5):1011-9. PubMed ID: 754576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A comparison between phase-contrast optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy for the analysis of air-borne asbestos fibers in an office environment].
    Marconi A; Falleni F; Campanella E
    Med Lav; 1993; 84(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 8366833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interwedge variation in the membrane filter method for airborne asbestos fibers.
    Hook MB; Feigley CE; Ludwig DA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Jul; 44(7):542-6. PubMed ID: 6613857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A predictive model for determining asbestos concentrations for fibers less than five micrometers in length.
    Kiefer MJ; Buchan RM; Keefe TJ; Blehm KD
    Environ Res; 1987 Jun; 43(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 3034564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimates of historical exposures by phase contrast and transmission electron microscopy in North Carolina USA asbestos textile plants.
    Dement JM; Myers D; Loomis D; Richardson D; Wolf S
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Sep; 66(9):574-83. PubMed ID: 18805888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asbestos exposures to truck drivers during World Trade Center cleanup operations.
    Breysse PN; Williams DL; Herbstman JB; Symons JM; Chillrud SN; Ross J; Henshaw S; Rees K; Watson M; Geyh AS
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Aug; 2(8):400-5. PubMed ID: 16009648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Update of potency factors for asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma.
    Berman DW; Crump KS
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2008; 38 Suppl 1():1-47. PubMed ID: 18671157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Use of the transmission electron microscope in the analysis of wine contamination by asbestos].
    Dufour G; Sebastien P; Gaudichet A; Bignon J; Bonnaud G
    Ann Nutr Aliment; 1978; 32(5):997-1009. PubMed ID: 754603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calibration standards for counting asbestos.
    Ortiz LW; Ettinger HJ; Fairchild CI
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1975 Feb; 36(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 1096583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.