These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6378967)

  • 1. Evaluation of the four-hour rapid 20E system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Izard D; Husson MO; Vincent P; Leclerc H; Monget D; Boeufgras JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 20(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 6378967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.
    Edberg SC; Atkinson B; Chambers C; Moore MH; Palumbo L; Zorzon CF; Singer JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 389946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the DMS Rapid E system for identification of clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Keville MW; Doern GV
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Nov; 20(5):1010-1. PubMed ID: 6392317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the API rapid E four-hour system with the API 20E overnight system for the identification of routine clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Overman TL; Plumley D; Overman SB; Goodman NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):542-5. PubMed ID: 3886691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
    Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of micro-ID and API 20E in rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Gooch WM; Hill GA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):885-90. PubMed ID: 7047556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Sensititre system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Staneck JL; Vincelette J; Lamothe F; Polk EA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Apr; 17(4):647-54. PubMed ID: 6343422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Freeman JW; Rowland RW; Overman SB; Goodman NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):895-8. PubMed ID: 7016913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product.
    O'Hara CM; Rhoden DL; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of the Eiken and API 20E systems and conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Castillo CB; Bruckner DA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):754-7. PubMed ID: 6490860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the repliscan system for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Woolfrey BF; Quall CO; Fox JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 7007430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Aldridge KE; Gardner BB; Clark SJ; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Jun; 7(6):507-13. PubMed ID: 353065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Supplementary rapid biochemical test panel for the API 20E bacterial identification system.
    Edinger RC; Migneault PC; Nolte FS
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 22(6):1063-5. PubMed ID: 3905846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Minibact, a new system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Comparison of Minibact, Micro-ID and API 20E with a conventional method as reference.
    Kjaeldgaard P; Nissen B; Lange N; Laursen H
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1986 Apr; 94(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 3524112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the Microbact-12E and 24E systems and the API-20E system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mugg P; Hill A
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Oct; 87(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 7026673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inoculation of API-20E from positive blood cultures.
    Blazevic DJ; Trombley CM; Lund ME
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Dec; 4(6):522-3. PubMed ID: 826548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
    Aldridge KE; Hodges RL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 7007414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the API 20E system to identify veterinary Enterobacteriaceae.
    Swanson EC; Collins MT
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Jul; 12(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 6999012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time-motion and cost comparison study of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional biochemical testing in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Bale MJ; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Dec; 14(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 6801085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of two four-hour identification systems with atypical strains of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Altwegg M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Dec; 2(6):529-33. PubMed ID: 6365536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.