These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6378969)

  • 1. Evaluation of a microtiter system for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Savuto PS; Ellner PD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 20(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 6378969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.
    Appelbaum PC; Kaufmann CS; Keifer JC; Venbrux HJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):614-21. PubMed ID: 6355150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the PRAS II, AN-Ident, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Burlage RS; Ellner PD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jul; 22(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 3894412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Karachewski NO; Busch EL; Wells CL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 21(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 3881468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of the RapID-ANA II panel for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Celig DM; Schreckenberger PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Mar; 29(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 2037661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the RapID-ANA system for identification of anaerobic bacteria of veterinary origin.
    Adney WS; Jones RL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 22(6):980-3. PubMed ID: 3905854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the BBL Crystal Anaerobe identification system.
    Cavallaro JJ; Wiggs LS; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3186-91. PubMed ID: 9399517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the oxyrase OxyPlate anaerobe incubation system.
    Wiggs LS; Cavallaro JJ; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Feb; 38(2):499-507. PubMed ID: 10655335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Problems encountered in clinical anaerobic bacteriology.
    Jousimies-Somer HR; Finegold SM
    Rev Infect Dis; 1984; 6 Suppl 1():S45-50. PubMed ID: 6201991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multi-centre evaluation of mass spectrometric identification of anaerobic bacteria using the VITEK® MS system.
    Garner O; Mochon A; Branda J; Burnham CA; Bythrow M; Ferraro M; Ginocchio C; Jennemann R; Manji R; Procop GW; Richter S; Rychert J; Sercia L; Westblade L; Lewinski M
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Apr; 20(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 23927597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the Anaerobe-Tek system for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Buesching WJ; Svirbely JR; Ayers LW
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 May; 17(5):824-9. PubMed ID: 6345578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Minitec and API as rapid diagnostic methods for anaerobic bacteria.
    Bergan T; Vangdal M; Salveson A
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1984; 91():103-11. PubMed ID: 6377470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of AN-Ident.
    Quentin C; Desailly-Chanson MA; Bebear C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Feb; 29(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 2007629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the MicroScan Urinary Combo Panel and API 20E system for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli isolated from clinical veterinary materials.
    Mathewson JJ; Simpson RB; Brooks FL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jan; 17(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 6338034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample preparation method influences direct identification of anaerobic bacteria from positive blood culture bottles using MALDI-TOF MS.
    Jeverica S; Nagy E; Mueller-Premru M; Papst L
    Anaerobe; 2018 Dec; 54():231-235. PubMed ID: 29861277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vitek 2 ANC card versus BBL Crystal Anaerobe and RapID ANA II for identification of clinical anaerobic bacteria.
    Blairon L; Maza ML; Wybo I; Piérard D; Dediste A; Vandenberg O
    Anaerobe; 2010 Aug; 16(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 20685292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the ATB 32 A system for identification of anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens.
    Looney WJ; Gallusser AJ; Modde HK
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jul; 28(7):1519-24. PubMed ID: 2199516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and reproducibility of the MicroScan rapid anaerobe identification system with an automated reader.
    Stoakes L; Kelly T; Manarin K; Schieven B; Lannigan R; Groves D; Hussain Z
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jun; 28(6):1135-8. PubMed ID: 2199485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptation of a coculture technique to the Minitek anaerobe system.
    Hussain Z; Lannigan R; Bürger H; Groves D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):645-6. PubMed ID: 3886697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of BBL Crystal ANR ID Kit and API rapid ID 32 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Moll WM; Ungerechts J; Marklein G; Schaal KP
    Zentralbl Bakteriol; 1996 Jul; 284(2-3):329-47. PubMed ID: 8837394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.