These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6378969)

  • 21. Evaluation of the RapID ANA system as a four-hour method for anaerobe identification.
    Downes J; Andrew JH
    Pathology; 1988 Jul; 20(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 3060822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Application of the diagnostic ability coefficient to the comparison of 3 identification miniaturized systems for identifying anaerobic bacteria].
    Bollet C; Elena M; Charrel J; Estrangin E; Durand-Gasselin J; Van Gaver P; de Micco P
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1988 Mar; 36(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 3283683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of two systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Gulletta E; Amato G; Nani E; Covelli I
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jun; 4(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 4018067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of RapID-ANA and Minitek with a conventional method for biochemical identification of anaerobes.
    Hussain Z; Lannigan R; Schieven BC; Stoakes L; Kelly T; Groves D
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 May; 7(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 3319374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development and evaluation of a coculture technique for identification of anaerobic organisms.
    Hussain Z; Bürger H; Lannigan R; Groves DJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Feb; 19(2):215-7. PubMed ID: 6365960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Barba MJ; Fernández A; Oviaño M; Fernández B; Velasco D; Bou G
    Anaerobe; 2014 Dec; 30():126-8. PubMed ID: 25256245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of media in the Anaerobe-Tek and Presumpto plate systems and evaluation of the Anaerobe-Tek system for identification of commonly encountered anaerobes.
    Lombard GL; Whaley DN; Dowell VR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Dec; 16(6):1066-72. PubMed ID: 6761359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy and reproducibility of a four-hour method for anaerobe identification.
    Appelbaum PC; Kaufmann CS; Depenbusch JW
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jun; 21(6):894-8. PubMed ID: 4008619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of a prereduced anaerobically sterilized medium (PRAS II) system for identification anaerobic microorganisms.
    Beaucage CM; Onderdonk AB
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Sep; 16(3):570-2. PubMed ID: 7130370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of API and Minitek to Center for Disease Control methods for the biochemical characterization of anaerobes.
    Hansen SL; Stewart BJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Sep; 4(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of an automated system for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Arzese A; Minisini R; Botta GA
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1994 Feb; 13(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 8013485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative evaluation of the Rapid ID 32A kit system, miniaturized standard procedure and a rapid fermentation procedure for the identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Pattyn SR; Ieven M; Buffet L
    Acta Clin Belg; 1993; 48(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 8392248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of systems for anaerobe identification.
    Sessa R; Di Pietro M; del Piano M
    Ann Ig; 1996; 8(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 9177081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy and reproducibility of the 4-hour ATB 32A method for anaerobe identification.
    Kitch TT; Appelbaum PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Nov; 27(11):2509-13. PubMed ID: 2681252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the new RapID-ANA II system for the identification of clinical anaerobic isolates.
    Marler LM; Siders JA; Wolters LC; Pettigrew Y; Skitt BL; Allen SD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 May; 29(5):874-8. PubMed ID: 2056052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the AnIdent system for the identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Stenson MJ; Lee DT; Rosenblatt JE; Contezac JM
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1986 May; 5(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 3709098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. MALDI-TOF MS identification of anaerobic bacteria: assessment of pre-analytical variables and specimen preparation techniques.
    Hsu YM; Burnham CA
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2014 Jun; 79(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 24666700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the AnaeroPack system for growth of anaerobic bacteria.
    Van Horn KG; Warren K; Baccaglini EJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Aug; 35(8):2170-3. PubMed ID: 9230409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of two matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry methods and API 20AN for identification of clinically relevant anaerobic bacteria.
    Jamal WY; Shahin M; Rotimi VO
    J Med Microbiol; 2013 Apr; 62(Pt 4):540-544. PubMed ID: 23242640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Micro-Media Systems anaerobe panel versus broth disk method in anaerobe antimicrobial testing.
    Polomski JC; Bauer SH; McClatchey KD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jun; 17(6):949-52. PubMed ID: 6874912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.