These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6378969)

  • 41. Selected Topics in Anaerobic Bacteriology.
    Church DL
    Microbiol Spectr; 2016 Aug; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 27726792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical evaluation of a simple, rapid procedure for the presumptive identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Holland JW; Gagnet SM; Lewis SA; Stauffer LR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Apr; 5(4):416-26. PubMed ID: 323283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Use of Presumpto Plates to identify anaerobic bacteria.
    Whaley DN; Wiggs LS; Miller PH; Srivastava PU; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 May; 33(5):1196-202. PubMed ID: 7615728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical evaluation of the Vitek ANI card for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Schreckenberger PC; Celig DM; Janda WM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Feb; 26(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 3343321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of two single-plate incubation systems and the anaerobic chamber for the cultivation of anaerobic bacteria.
    Downes J; Mangels JI; Holden J; Ferraro MJ; Baron EJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Feb; 28(2):246-8. PubMed ID: 2179257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Current issues and problems in dealing with anaerobes in the clinical laboratory.
    Allen SD; Siders JA; Marler LM
    Clin Lab Med; 1995 Jun; 15(2):333-64. PubMed ID: 7671577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparative evaluation of three identification systems for anaerobes.
    Murray PR; Weber CJ; Niles AC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jul; 22(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 2862161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Paraclostridium is the Main Genus of Anaerobic Bacteria Isolated from New Species of the Marine Sponge Plakina in the Brazilian Southeast Coast.
    de Oliveira BFR; Cavalcanti MD; de Oliveira Nunes S; Lobo LA; Domingues RMCP; Muricy G; Laport MS
    Curr Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 76(6):713-722. PubMed ID: 30968206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Identification of anaerobes on the Minitek System, compared to a conventional system.
    Holloway Y; Dankert J
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1979; 245(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 44787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Performance evaluation of a new matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, ASTA MicroIDSys system, in bacterial identification against clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria.
    Kim D; Ji S; Kim JR; Kim M; Byun JH; Yum JH; Yong D; Lee K
    Anaerobe; 2020 Feb; 61():102131. PubMed ID: 31778809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of four commercial brucella agar media for growth of anaerobic organisms.
    Mangels JI; Douglas BP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Oct; 27(10):2268-71. PubMed ID: 2584378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of the AnaeroPack system for growth of clinically significant anaerobes.
    Delaney ML; Onderdonk AB
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Mar; 35(3):558-62. PubMed ID: 9041388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of the MicroScan antimicrobial susceptibility system with the autoSCAN-4 automated reader.
    Baker CN; Stocker SA; Rhoden DL; Thornsberry C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jan; 23(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 3700598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Reliability of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in the identification of anaerobic bacteria].
    Vega-Castaño S; Ferreira L; González-Ávila M; Sánchez-Juanes F; García-García MI; García-Sánchez JE; González-Buitrago JM; Muñoz-Bellido JL
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2012 Dec; 30(10):597-601. PubMed ID: 22521278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Rapid enzymatic characterization of clinically encountered anaerobic bacteria with the API ZYM system.
    Marler L; Allen S; Siders J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Aug; 3(4):294-300. PubMed ID: 6386457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of AnaeroGen system for growth of anaerobic bacteria.
    Miller PH; Wiggs LS; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Sep; 33(9):2388-91. PubMed ID: 7494033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The microbial spectrum of brain abscess with special reference to anaerobic bacteria.
    Chaudhry R; Dhawan B; Laxmi BV; Mehta VS
    Br J Neurosurg; 1998 Apr; 12(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 11013664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.
    Pfaller MA; Sahm D; O'Hara C; Ciaglia C; Yu M; Yamane N; Scharnweber G; Rhoden D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Jul; 29(7):1422-8. PubMed ID: 1885737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of American MicroScan dry and frozen microdilution trays.
    Schieven BC; Hussain Z; Lannigan R
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Oct; 22(4):495-6. PubMed ID: 3935659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of the Minitek system for direct identification of anaerobic rods from positive blood cultures.
    Polomski JC; McClatchey KD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Oct; 16(4):673-5. PubMed ID: 6759525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.