These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6379156)

  • 1. Sectional impression tray for patients with constricted oral opening.
    Luebke RJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Jul; 52(1):135-7. PubMed ID: 6379156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maxillary sectional impression tray technique for microstomic patients.
    Arcuri MR; Eike L; Deets K
    Quintessence Dent Technol; 1986; 10(10):627-9. PubMed ID: 3538213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A sectional stock tray system for making impressions.
    Ohkubo C; Ohkubo C; Hosoi T; Kurtz KS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 12886215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technique for making flexible impression trays for the microstomic patient.
    Whitsitt JA; Battle LW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):608-9. PubMed ID: 6389845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spring-loaded custom tray: an alternative technique for recording impressions in a patient with a restricted mouth opening.
    Ahmad M; Dhanasekar B; Aparna IN; Naim H
    Gen Dent; 2014; 62(2):e24-6. PubMed ID: 24598506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microstomia-a treatment challenge to a prosthodontist.
    Dewan SK; Arora A; Sehgal M; Khullar A
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Apr; 9(4):ZD12-3. PubMed ID: 26023653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impression material thickness in stock and custom trays.
    Bomberg TJ; Hatch RA; Hoffman W
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Aug; 54(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 3903109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A screw-connected sectional impression tray for patient with limited opening.
    Paprocki GJ; Karunagaran S; Jain V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jun; 111(6):529-31. PubMed ID: 24360014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An effect of tray design and material retention on the linear dimensional changes in polysulfide impressions.
    Walters RA; Spurrier S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Mar; 63(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 2407824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study of the interocclusal distortion in impressions taken with different types of closed-mouth trays and two types of impression materials.
    Mañes-Ferrer JF; Selva-Otaolaurruchi EJ; Parra-Arenós C; Selfa-Bas I
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2010 Jan; 15(1):e79-84. PubMed ID: 19680183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effects of different tray types on the resulting impression].
    Biffar R; Bittner B
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):624-7. PubMed ID: 2700730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impression tray--an important factor in impression precision.
    Rehberg HJ
    Int Dent J; 1977 Jun; 27(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 328405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fabrication of a custom-made impression tray for making preliminary impressions of edentulous mandibles.
    Sofou AM; Diakoyianni-Mordohai I; Pissiotis AL; Emmanuel I
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):513-6. PubMed ID: 9807132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Individual tray composed of two parts for functional impressions in case of pterygoid defects].
    Orlicki R; Jaworska M; Kasperski J
    Protet Stomatol; 1989; 39(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 2701123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Different Impression Techniques When Using the All-on-Four Implant Treatment Protocol.
    Siadat H; Alikhasi M; Beyabanaki E; Rahimian S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 27148987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.