114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6379529)
1. Fetal biophysical profile score and the nonstress test: a comparative trial.
Manning FA; Lange IR; Morrison I; Harman CR
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Sep; 64(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 6379529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus the nonstress test in the management of high-risk pregnancies.
Platt LD; Walla CA; Paul RH; Trujillo ME; Loesser CV; Jacobs ND; Broussard PM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):624-33. PubMed ID: 4061530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.
Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Biophysical profile in prolonged pregnancy. Another alternative of fetal surveillance].
Jiménez Solis G; Izquierdo Puente JC; Barraza Espinoza RM; Sánchez Tenorio E; García Alonso A
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1990 Oct; 58():284-8. PubMed ID: 2101378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The biophysical profile in labor.
Sassoon DA; Castro LC; Davis JL; Bear M; Hobel CJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 76(3 Pt 1):360-5. PubMed ID: 2381614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biophysical profile for antepartum fetal assessment.
Norman LA; Karp LE
Am Fam Physician; 1986 Oct; 34(4):83-9. PubMed ID: 3532741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antenatal fetal assessment using biophysical profile score.
Begum F; Buckshee K; Pande JN
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 1996 Aug; 22(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 9103656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Biophysical profile in prolonged pregnancy. Another alternative to fetal monitoring].
Jiménez Solis G; Izquierdo Puente JC; Barraza Espinoza RM; Sánchez Tenorio E; García Alonso A
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1990 Oct; 58():284-8. PubMed ID: 2292430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile.
Platt LD; Eglinton GS; Sipos L; Broussard PM; Paul RH
Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Apr; 61(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 6681892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Prediction of fetal hypoxia using the fetal biophysical profile].
Urbánková E; Toldy M
Cesk Gynekol; 1989 Dec; 54(10):733-9. PubMed ID: 2698277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relationship between fetal biophysical assessment, umbilical artery velocimetry, and fetal acidosis.
Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Rodis JF; McLean DA; Fleming AD; Scorza WE
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Apr; 77(4):622-6. PubMed ID: 2002989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Fetal heart rate monitoring in the upright pregnant woman].
Riehn A; Sarembe B; Riehn F; Szendzielorz D
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(24):1519-23. PubMed ID: 2293544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antenatal fetal assessment: contraction stress test, nonstress test, vibroacoustic stimulation, amniotic fluid volume, biophysical profile, and modified biophysical profile--an overview.
Devoe LD
Semin Perinatol; 2008 Aug; 32(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 18652922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive value of the nonreactive nonstress test in evaluating neonatal outcome.
Bhide A; Bhattacharya MS
J Postgrad Med; 1990 Apr; 36(2):104-5. PubMed ID: 2097363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of a negative antepartum test: contraction stress test and modified biophysical profile.
Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK; Dorchester W
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 8041536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationships among the fetal biophysical profile, umbilical cord pH, and Apgar scores.
Vintzileos AM; Gaffney SE; Salinger LM; Kontopoulos VG; Campbell WA; Nochimson DJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 157(3):627-31. PubMed ID: 3631164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal biophysical profile score in triplet pregnancies.
Alcalay M; Lipitz S; Ben Rafael Z; Barkai G; Mashiach S
J Reprod Med; 1994 Jun; 39(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 7932395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic stimulation testing.
Kuhlman KA; Depp R
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1988 Jun; 15(2):303-19. PubMed ID: 3226664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Middle cerebral/umbilical artery resistance index ratio as sensitive parameter for fetal well-being and neonatal outcome in patients with preeclampsia: case-control study.
Ebrashy A; Azmy O; Ibrahim M; Waly M; Edris A
Croat Med J; 2005 Oct; 46(5):821-5. PubMed ID: 16158478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The fetal biophysical profile score: current status.
Manning FA
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1990 Mar; 17(1):147-62. PubMed ID: 2192316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
