These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6379529)

  • 21. Predictive value of amniotic fluid index for oligohydramnios in patients with prolonged pregnancies.
    O'Reilly-Green CP; Divon MY
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1996; 5(4):218-26. PubMed ID: 8796797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of current antepartum fetal tests.
    Tannirandorn Y; Uerpairojkit B; Phaosavasdi S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jan; 78(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 7622974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The fetal biophysical profile in pregnancies with grade III placentas.
    Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Feinstein SJ; Lodeiro JG; Weinbaum PJ; Nochimson DJ
    Am J Perinatol; 1987 Apr; 4(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 3566887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of nonstress fetal heart rate testing in multiple gestations.
    Blake GD; Knuppel RA; Ingardia CJ; Lake M; Aumann G; Hanson M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Apr; 63(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 6700901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Antepartum determination of fetal health: composite biophysical profile scoring.
    Manning FA; Morrison I; Lange IR; Harman C
    Clin Perinatol; 1982 Jun; 9(2):285-96. PubMed ID: 7116752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Continuing role of the nonstress test in the management of postdates pregnancy.
    Phelan JP; Platt LD; Yeh SY; Trujillo M; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Nov; 64(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 6493655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fetal assessment based on the fetal biophysical profile score: relationship of last BPS result to subsequent cerebral palsy.
    Manning FA; Bondagji N; Harman CR; Casiro O; Menticoglou S; Morrison I
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(7):720-9. PubMed ID: 9436057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Usefulness of fetal biophysical profile in preterm rupture of membranes with treatment].
    Romero Arauz JF; Martínez Chéquer JC; Alonso López AG; Jurado Hernández VH; Ayala Méndez JA
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2005 Aug; 73(8):415-23. PubMed ID: 16304967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fetal acceleration determinations and perinatal outcome.
    Brettschneider F; Goldstein P; Baer D; Kimball A; London R
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Jul; 25(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 7401056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Amnioscopy: its prognostic and diagnostic value in relation to fetal distress].
    Topete Pérez de Leon ; Vargas García C; Topete Orozco LM; Rodríguez LF; Lowenberg E
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1973 Nov; 34(205):445-56. PubMed ID: 4768886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fetal biophysical profile scoring: current status.
    Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Rodis JF
    Clin Perinatol; 1989 Sep; 16(3):661-89. PubMed ID: 2673614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Antepartum surveillance in preterm rupture of membranes.
    Vintzileos AM
    J Perinat Med; 1996; 24(4):319-26. PubMed ID: 8880628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Biophysical profile in twin pregnancy: prospective study].
    Medina D; Vargas N; Bustos JC; Cadima R; Lavarello C
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1994; 59(5):343-8. PubMed ID: 7569148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Antepartum fetal heart testing: a clinical appraisal.
    Goldkrand JW; Benjamin DS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jan; 63(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 6691017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the acoustic stimulation test with nonstress test. A randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Tongsong T; Piyamongkol W
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan; 39(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 8169910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Antepartum fetal assessment using a fetal biophysical profile score.
    Baskett TF; Gray JH; Prewett SJ; Young LM; Allen AC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Mar; 148(5):630-3. PubMed ID: 6702929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The fetal biophysical profile and its predictive value.
    Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Ingardia CJ; Nochimson DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 62(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 6877682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Assessment of the biophysical profile: the fetal Apgar].
    Ferguson HW
    Servir; 1989; 38(3):187-9. PubMed ID: 2502853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Condition-specific antepartum fetal testing.
    Kontopoulos EV; Vintzileos AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1546-51. PubMed ID: 15547524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The application of multiple-parameter scoring to antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Devoe LD; Yanowitch G; Azor H
    J Reprod Med; 1981 May; 26(5):250-4. PubMed ID: 7252938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.