These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6379748)

  • 1. Iopamidol and Conray 60: comparison in superselective angiography.
    Schonfeld SM; Pinto RS; Schonfeld AR; Berenstein A; Manuell M; Kricheff II
    Radiology; 1984 Sep; 152(3):809-11. PubMed ID: 6379748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Iopamidol compared with Conray in peripheral angiography.
    Wojciechowski J; Johansson R; Björk L
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1982; 23(6):549-52. PubMed ID: 6763456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety of contrast media in cerebral angiography: iopamidol vs. methylglucamine iothalamate.
    Bird CR; Drayer BP; Velaj R; Triolo PJ; Allen S; Bates M; Yeates AE; Heinz ER; Osborne DR
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1984; 5(6):801-3. PubMed ID: 6437183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast agent induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: iopamidol versus meglumine iothalamate.
    Lea Thomas M; Keeling FP; Piaggio RB; Treweeke PS
    Br J Radiol; 1984 Mar; 57(675):205-7. PubMed ID: 6365232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of tri-iodoisophthaldiamide with meglumine lothalamate in phlebography of the leg.
    Thomas ML; Briggs GM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Apr; 138(4):725-7. PubMed ID: 7039276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast media for left ventricular angiography. A comparison between Cardio-Conray and iopamidol.
    Gwilt DJ; Nagle RE
    Br Heart J; 1984 Apr; 51(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 6200129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Iopamidol arteriography: discomfort and pain.
    Dotter CT; Rösch J; Erlandson M; Buschman RW; Ogilvie R
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):819-21. PubMed ID: 3890014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Iopamidol and meglumine diatrizoate: comparison of effects on patient discomfort during aortofemoral arteriography.
    Widrich WC; Beckman CF; Robbins AH; Scholz FJ; Srinivasan MK; Hayes EJ; Kellum CD; Newman T
    Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 6344138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of iopamidol and diatrizoate in peripheral angiography.
    Fletcher EW
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Jan; 55(649):36-8. PubMed ID: 7032637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized blind trial of Iopamidol and meglumine calcium metrizoate (Triosil 280, Isopaque Cerebral) in cerebral angiography.
    Molyneux AJ; Sheldon PW
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Feb; 55(650):117-9. PubMed ID: 7034840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative trial of sodium meglumine ioxaglate (Hexabrix) and iopamidol (Niopam) for cerebral angiography.
    Molyneux AJ; Sheldon PW; Yates DA
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Dec; 55(660):881-4. PubMed ID: 6756533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The old and the new: a study of five contrast media for urography.
    Davies P; Panto PN; Buckley J; Richardson RE
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Jul; 58(691):593-7. PubMed ID: 3893610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inhibition of platelet function by contrast media: iopamidol and ioxaglate versus iothalamate. Work in progress.
    Rao AK; Rao VM; Willis J; Beckett C; Steiner RM
    Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 4011893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of iopamidol with three other contrast media in orbital venography/cavernous sinography.
    Macpherson P
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Jul; 55(655):539-40. PubMed ID: 7150905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative neurotoxicity of angiographic contrast media.
    Velaj R; Drayer B; Albright R; Fram E
    Neurology; 1985 Sep; 35(9):1290-8. PubMed ID: 3927186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Iopamidol compared with Isopaque Cerebral in angiography of the lower extremities].
    Aspestrand F
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1984 Nov; 104(31):2164-5. PubMed ID: 6397873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of ionic and nonionic contrast media on the sickling phenomenon.
    Rao VM; Rao AK; Steiner RM; Burka ER; Grainger RG; Ballas SK
    Radiology; 1982 Jul; 144(2):291-3. PubMed ID: 7089282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical cardiovascular experiences with iopamidol: a new non-ionic contrast medium.
    Partridge JB; Robinson PJ; Turnbull CM; Stoker JB; Boyle RM; Morrison GW
    Clin Radiol; 1981 Jul; 32(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 6972848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical testing of iohexol, conray meglumine and amipaque in cerebral angiography.
    Ingstrup HM; Hauge P
    Neuroradiology; 1982; 23(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 7043304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Circulatory and adverse effects of nonionic contrast media in arteriography. Results of a double-blind study].
    Deininger HK; Franzen G
    Radiologe; 1983 Jul; 23(7):327-33. PubMed ID: 6353478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.