These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6381027)

  • 1. [Composites in the lateral dental area from the technological viewpoint].
    Viohl J
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1984 May; 39(5):342-8. PubMed ID: 6381027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Adhesion--a current problem of filling materials].
    Karal'nik DM
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1985; 64(3):90-3. PubMed ID: 3901404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Results of physical studies of Isosite filling materials].
    Welker D; Ziener L; Dietze S
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1985; 73(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 3160183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [In vitro comparisons of the hardness and polishability of amalgam fillings].
    Radtke G; Pilz ME
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1983; 71(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 6224370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The use of composites (with referenceto their technological and clinical properties)].
    Sobkowiak EM; Held M
    Stomatol DDR; 1979 Mar; 29(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 380059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reactions to implants of conventional and new dental restorative materials.
    Matsui A; Buonocore M; Sayegh F; Yamaki M
    J Dent Child; 1967 Sep; 34(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 5341569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental restoration materials and physical development in children.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2012; 78():c138. PubMed ID: 23306045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hardness and Young's modulus determined by nanoindentation technique of filler particles of dental restorative materials compared with human enamel.
    Willems G; Celis JP; Lambrechts P; Braem M; Vanherle G
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Jun; 27(6):747-55. PubMed ID: 8408104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation.
    Sousa RP; Zanin IC; Lima JP; Vasconcelos SM; Melo MA; Beltrão HC; Rodrigues LK
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19026481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Radiographic in vitro study of proximal (amalgam) contour using commercial matrix retainers and copper rings].
    Steagall L; de Lima CA; Silva Jdo N
    Rev Fac Odontol Sao Paulo; 1975; 13(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 801685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Lateral tooth composites--an assessment of the situation].
    Phillips RW; Lutz F; Roulet JF
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1983 Aug; 93(8):666-73. PubMed ID: 6578596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Does humidity affect the polymerization reaction of composites? 1].
    Reinhardt KJ; Vahl J
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1983 Dec; 38(12):1070-2. PubMed ID: 6581961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effect of the setting time and polish on the stability and corrosion behavior of dental amalgams].
    Venz S; Dermann K
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1984 May; 39(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 6381028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making it stick.
    Bartlett D
    Dent Update; 2008 Apr; 35(3):209. PubMed ID: 18507229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative studies on the mechanical properties of the current self-hardening and light-hardening plastic filling materials].
    Nolden R
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):506-10. PubMed ID: 6931813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An advance in condensable composites.
    Munoz-Viveros CA
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (23):S3-5. PubMed ID: 12089755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The physical properties of dental varnishes: a comparative study.
    Jeffrey IW; Donaldson D
    Dent Pract Dent Rec; 1971 Feb; 21(6):197-200. PubMed ID: 5278934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biocompatibility of posterior restorative materials.
    Schuster GS; Lefebvre CA; Wataha JC; White SN
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):17-31. PubMed ID: 9120609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Status and prospects of using amalgam in the therapeutic dentistry clinic].
    Cholokova GS; Sergunina OS
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1984; 63(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 6585063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.