136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6381526)
1. Collaborative evaluation of the Abbott yeast identification system.
Cooper BH; Prowant S; Alexander B; Brunson DH
J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 19(6):853-6. PubMed ID: 6381526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
Oblack DL; Rhodes JC; Martin WJ
J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Feb; 13(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 7009641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of four commercial biochemical test systems for identification of yeasts.
Bergan T; Hollum AB; Vangdal M
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 1(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 6756911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variation in Microbial Identification System accuracy for yeast identification depending on commercial source of Sabouraud dextrose agar.
Kellogg JA; Bankert DA; Chaturvedi V
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):2080-3. PubMed ID: 10325387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the new Mycotube test-kit for yeast identification.
Guinet RM
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Feb; 4(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 3886377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid identification of yeasts by semi-automated and conventional methods.
Qadri SM; Flournoy DJ; Qadri SG; Ramirez EG
Med Microbiol Immunol; 1986; 175(5):307-16. PubMed ID: 3762492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Biolog MicroStation system for yeast identification.
McGinnis MR; Molina TC; Pierson DL; Mishra SK
J Med Vet Mycol; 1996; 34(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 8912169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of yeast species isolated from bovine intramammary infection.
Fadda ME; Pisano MB; Scaccabarozzi L; Mossa V; Deplano M; Moroni P; Liciardi M; Cosentino S
J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(12):7692-7. PubMed ID: 24119798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the new API 20C strip for yeast identification against a conventional method.
Land GA; Harrison BA; Hulme KL; Cooper BH; Byrd JC
J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Sep; 10(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 385621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A simple disk-diffusion test for differentiation of yeast species.
Sobczak H
J Med Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 20(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 3906135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Abbott Quantum II yeast identification system.
Salkin IF; Schadow KH; Bankaitis LA; McGinnis MR; Kemna ME
J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):442-4. PubMed ID: 3900130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limitations of the current microbial identification system for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
Kellogg JA; Bankert DA; Chaturvedi V
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 May; 36(5):1197-200. PubMed ID: 9574676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of analytical methods for the numerical taxonomy of yeasts.
Jones GR
J Gen Microbiol; 1975 Jul; 89(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 1097592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems.
Verweij PE; Breuker IM; Rijs AJ; Meis JF
J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 52(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 10474518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.
Milan EP; Malheiros ES; Fischman O; Colombo AL
Mycopathologia; 1997; 137(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 9368409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a commercial multitest system for identification of yeasts.
Qadri SM; Nichols CW
Am J Med Technol; 1978 May; 44(5):368-72. PubMed ID: 354378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of two commercialized systems for the rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
Quindós G; Lipperheide V; Pontón J
Mycoses; 1993; 36(9-10):299-303. PubMed ID: 8015561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of numerical taxonomy in the genus candida and certain related yeast genera.
Herlea V
Arch Roum Pathol Exp Microbiol; 1974; 33(3-4):335-55. PubMed ID: 4619554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Pro-Lab ID ring system for the identification of medically important yeasts.
Sekhon AS; Padhye AA; Garg AK; Rae R
Mycopathologia; 1992 Jul; 119(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 1406902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
