These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of various methodologies with respect to specificity and sensitivity in biomonitoring occupational exposure to mutagens and carcinogens. Lohman PH; Jansen JD; Baan RA IARC Sci Publ; 1984; (59):259-77. PubMed ID: 6545282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of cytogenetic monitoring in the workplace: a position paper of the American Industrial Health Council. Irr JD Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 160():527-31. PubMed ID: 6382339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Strategy in directed preventive studies. I. Evaluation of health effects of exposure to carcinogenic factors. Problem of development- al anomalies and neoplasms in children. Reproduction disorders]. Indulski JA; Kowalski Z Med Pr; 1990; 41(4):193-202. PubMed ID: 2131393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of mutagenicity tests in assessing occupational genotoxic risks. Vainio H; Sorsa M Prog Clin Biol Res; 1982; 109():433-42. PubMed ID: 7167555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Monitoring of sister chromatid exchange and micronuclei as biological endpoints. Sorsa M IARC Sci Publ; 1984; (59):339-49. PubMed ID: 6545285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An overview of chromosomal, micronucleus, heritable effects, dominant lethal, heritable translocation, and specific locus tests. Livingston GK Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 160():417-27. PubMed ID: 6382336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Types of exposure models and advantages and disadvantages of sources of exposure data for use in occupational reproductive studies. Lemasters GK; Selevan SG Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 160():67-79. PubMed ID: 6382341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The predictability of bioassays. Anderson D Prog Clin Biol Res; 1982; 109():149-68. PubMed ID: 6891964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Genetic toxicology and occupational medicine: prospects of its use]. Laurent C Rev Med Liege; 1986 Mar; 41(6):209-16. PubMed ID: 3518009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Embryotoxicity and genotoxicity of nickel. Leonard A; Jacquet P IARC Sci Publ; 1984; (53):277-91. PubMed ID: 6398285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A carcinogens--methods for detecting environmental muta/carcinogens]. Morimoto K; Koizumi A Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1985 Apr; 12(4):789-97. PubMed ID: 3885860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mutagenesis and carcinogenesis by nitropyrenes and cancer chemotherapeutics. Meeting report. Mutat Res; 1986 Feb; 164(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 3512986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A chromosome study among stainless steel welders. Husgafvel-Pursiainen K; Kalliomäki PL; Sorsa M J Occup Med; 1982 Oct; 24(10):762-6. PubMed ID: 7143122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo methods for evaluating genotoxicity. Swenberg JA Dev Toxicol Environ Sci; 1980; 8():165-70. PubMed ID: 7308018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Integration of laboratory and epidemiologic studies to evaluate genotoxic exposure in tool and die workers. Garry VF; Jacobs DR; Kreiger RA; Nelson RL; Loeppky R; Harkins ME Prog Clin Biol Res; 1986; 207():183-93. PubMed ID: 3960871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Are mutagenicity, carcinogenicity and genotoxicity the same thing?]. Pelkonen O Duodecim; 1983; 99(22):1586-92. PubMed ID: 6357728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Theory and practice of primary cancer prevention]. Tompa A Magy Onkol; 2007; 51(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 17417671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mutagenic activity of diesel emissions. Lewtas J Dev Toxicol Environ Sci; 1982; 10():243-64. PubMed ID: 6176425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]