These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6383930)

  • 1. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mastroeni P; Carbone M; Fera MT; Teti G
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the Micro-ID system (author's transl)].
    Peuckert W; Pelz K
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Aug; 247(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 6999799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Micro-ID, for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Izard D; Gavini F; Ochin D; Enayeh E; Leclerc H
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1980 Dec; 28(10):681-4. PubMed ID: 7008005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of Micro-ID, API 20 E and a conventional technique for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae].
    Gregersen T; Persson B; Jensen MM
    Nord Vet Med; 1980 May; 32(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 6992099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Micro-ID, a modified Minitek system, and conventional methods for four-hour identification of Enterobacteriacae directly from blood cultures.
    Wellstood S
    Am J Med Technol; 1982 Sep; 48(9):769-73. PubMed ID: 6753582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of two miniaturized systems widely used in the laboratories for the identification of the "Enterobacteriaceae" (author's transl)].
    Santini GF; Crovatto M; Chiaradia V; Marchi MP
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1979 Mar; 15(1):78-102. PubMed ID: 396548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Kelly MT; Latimer JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 7024296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of two commerical methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae--API 20E and the Enterotube--with conventional methods.
    Hayek LJ; Willis GW
    J Clin Pathol; 1976 Feb; 29(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 777035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison of API-10s and Minitek with conventional biochemical tests (author's transl)].
    Stanek G; Hirschl A; Rotter M
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Feb; 246(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 6999781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using SIB and API kits to identify and biotype enterobacteria of different origin.
    Kulinich LI; Fish NG; Mazitova OP; Dratvin SA; Birger MO
    J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1987; 31(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 3316379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Minibact, a new system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Comparison of Minibact, Micro-ID and API 20E with a conventional method as reference.
    Kjaeldgaard P; Nissen B; Lange N; Laursen H
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1986 Apr; 94(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 3524112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of API 20E System and Encise Enterotube for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae of animal origin.
    Devenish JA; Barnum DA
    Can J Comp Med; 1980 Jul; 44(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 7000321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative evaluation of 3 miniaturized systems (API 20E, Enterotube II, Sensititre AP60) commonly used in clinical microbiology laboratories].
    Chiaradia V; Pistello M; Pascoli L; Tarabini Castellani G; Beduz R; Menin A; Santini G
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1983 Jun; 19(2):159-75. PubMed ID: 6374735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A cost-effective method for the presumptive identification of Enterobacteriaceae for diagnostic microbiology laboratories.
    Ng LS; Tan TY; Yeow SC
    Pathology; 2010 Apr; 42(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 20350223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae: evaluation of 3 commercial systems].
    Sala A; Dore R; Raffaele L; Cappello P
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1985 Jun; 21(2):214-24. PubMed ID: 4080964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Use of microsystems for the identification of Enterbacteria in the microbiological laboratory: comments on technics and identification procedures].
    Ottaviani F; Aliani A; Benetti L; Viero B
    Ann Sclavo; 1976; 18(5):779-90. PubMed ID: 800723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parallel comparison of accuracy of API 20E, Vitek GNI, MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID, and Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common gram-negative, non-glucose-fermenting bacilli.
    O'Hara CM; Tenover FC; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Dec; 31(12):3165-9. PubMed ID: 8308108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of enteric identification systems.
    Borchardt KA; Gibson J
    Health Lab Sci; 1977 Jan; 14(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 319082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Usefulness of the diagnostic kit Enteroplast for identification of Enterobacteriaceae].
    Zaremba M; Fiedoruk J; Borowski J
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1989; 41(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 2668658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of micro-ID and API 20E in rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Gooch WM; Hill GA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):885-90. PubMed ID: 7047556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.