These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6385783)

  • 1. Maxillary skeletal and dental change with Fränkel appliance therapy--an implant study.
    Brieden CM; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Kulbersh R
    Angle Orthod; 1984 Jul; 54(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 6385783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Arch width development in Class II patients treated with the Fränkel appliance.
    McDougall PD; McNamara JA; Dierkes JM
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 82(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 6760718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Rodrigues de Almeida M; Castanha Henriques JF; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Ursi W
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 12401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term maxillary changes in patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion treated with slow and rapid palatal expansion.
    Lima Filho RM; de Oliveira Ruellas AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 18774084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentoskeletal effects of a removable appliance for expansion of the maxillary arch: a postero-anterior cephalometric study.
    Defraia E; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Tollaro I
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 17971351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [An eight-factor analysis of early skeletal Class II malocclusion using Fränkel appliance].
    Lai W; Lu S; Huang N; Zhao M
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Aug; 17(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 12539305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of Twin Block, Andresen and removable appliances in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Trenouth MJ
    Funct Orthod; 1992; 9(4):26-31. PubMed ID: 1452055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morphologic changes in the transverse dimension using the Fränkel appliance.
    Owen AH
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Mar; 83(3):200-17. PubMed ID: 6338726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skeletal Class II treatment with the Chateau appliance.
    Craig WH; Petit HP; Chateau M
    J Pedod; 1987; 11(2):120-38. PubMed ID: 3546662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of dental and dentoalveolar changes between rapid palatal expansion and nickel-titanium palatal expansion appliances.
    Ciambotti C; Ngan P; Durkee M; Kohli K; Kim H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 11174532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage--a randomized clinical trial: cephalometric results.
    Benson PE; Tinsley D; O'Dwyer JJ; Majumdar A; Doyle P; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 18005834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of results in Class II: division 1 malocclusions by treated Frankel appliance].
    Yiğit MD; Akin SZ
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 2489152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Case report: modified use of the Jasper Jumper appliance in a skeletal Class II mixed dentition case requiring palatal expansion.
    Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 9267576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An assessment of Andresen therapy on class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Calvert FJ
    Br J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 9(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 6954989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Skeletal and dental response to rapid maxillary expansion with 2- versus 4-band appliances.
    Davidovitch M; Efstathiou S; Sarne O; Vardimon AD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):483-92. PubMed ID: 15821693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance.
    Valant JR; Sinclair PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 2916470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of the Frankel lateral vestibular shields on the widening of the upper jaw. An experimental investigation in the rat.
    Stutzmann J; Petrovic A; Graber TM
    Stomatol DDR; 1983 Nov; 33(11):753-66. PubMed ID: 6377588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving Class II malocclusion as a side-effect of rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective clinical study.
    Guest SS; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 21055598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.