121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6386517)
1. The Medicaid cutoff and abortion services for the poor.
Henshaw SK; Wallisch LS
Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(4):171-2, 177-80. PubMed ID: 6386517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.
Forrest JD; Samara R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of restricting Medicaid financing for abortion.
Trussell J; Menken J; Lindheim BL; Vaughan B
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(3):120-3, 127-30. PubMed ID: 6995147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States.
Roberts SC; Gould H; Kimport K; Weitz TA; Foster DG
Womens Health Issues; 2014; 24(2):e211-8. PubMed ID: 24630423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
Haas-Wilson D
J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion in the United States, 1977-1978.
Forrest JD; Sullivan E; Tietze C
Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(6):329-41. PubMed ID: 401078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors hindering access to abortion services.
Henshaw SK
Fam Plann Perspect; 1995; 27(2):54-9, 87. PubMed ID: 7796896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.
Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Controversy over abortion funding increases.
Hosp Prog; 1980 Mar; 61(3):32. PubMed ID: 10297698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. States rebel against Federal abortion orders.
Kent C; Tokarski C
J Am Health Policy; 1994; 4(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 10132602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. More family planning and abortion services needed.
Gold R
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 12267090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends in rates of live births and abortions following state restrictions on public funding of abortion.
Korenbrot CC; Brindis C; Priddy F
Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(6):555-62. PubMed ID: 2124355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expanding Medicaid coverage for pregnant women: estimates of the impact and cost.
Torres A; Kenney AM
Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 2649392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. After the Hyde Amendment: public funding for abortion in FY 1978.
Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 6995148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.
Nestor B; Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 6432576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester.
Drey EA; Foster DG; Jackson RA; Lee SJ; Cardenas LH; Darney PD
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 107(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 16394050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. At what cost? Payment for abortion care by U.S. women.
Jones RK; Upadhyay UD; Weitz TA
Womens Health Issues; 2013; 23(3):e173-8. PubMed ID: 23660430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Hyde Amendment and the future.
Rosoff JI
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(4):172. PubMed ID: 7002585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Publicly funded abortions in FY 1980 and FY 1981.
Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(4):204-7. PubMed ID: 6811313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on the timing of abortion.
Joyce T; Kaestner R
Fam Plann Perspect; 2000; 32(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 10710701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
