These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6386854)

  • 1. Evaluation of new blood culture processing systems.
    Moody JA; Fasching CE; Shanholtzer CJ; Gerding DN; Peterson LR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Sep; 20(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 6386854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Antibiotic Removal Device.
    Appleman MD; Swinney RS; Heseltine PN
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Feb; 15(2):278-81. PubMed ID: 7068823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved recovery of microorganisms from patients receiving antibiotics with the antimicrobial removal device.
    Peterson LR; Shanholtzer CJ; Mohn ML; Gerding DN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Nov; 80(5):692-6. PubMed ID: 6356871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microbiological and clinical evaluation of the isolator lysis-centrifugation blood culture tube.
    Henry NK; McLimans CA; Wright AJ; Thompson RL; Wilson WR; Washington JA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 May; 17(5):864-9. PubMed ID: 6863507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical comparison of the recoveries of bloodstream pathogens in Septi-Chek brain heart infusion broth with saponin, Septi-Chek tryptic soy broth, and the isolator lysis-centrifugation system.
    Murray PR; Spizzo AW; Niles AC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 May; 29(5):901-5. PubMed ID: 2056056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of an Antimicrobial Removal Device (ARD) for detection of septicemia.
    Lundholm M
    Scand J Infect Dis; 1986; 18(5):461-3. PubMed ID: 3535052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The antimicrobial removal device. A microbiological and clinical evaluation.
    Wright AJ; Thompson RL; McLimans CA; Wilson WR; Washington JA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Aug; 78(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 7048940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost effectiveness of the antibiotic removal device for processing blood cultures.
    de Silva MI; Qadri SM; Hood E
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1986 Sep; 78(9):857-61. PubMed ID: 3097333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a lysis-centrifugation and biphasic bottle blood culture system during routine use.
    Kelly MT; Buck GE; Fojtasek MF
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):554-7. PubMed ID: 6355148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Isolator 1.5 Microbial Tube with a conventional blood culture broth system for detection of bacteremia in children.
    Campos JM; Spainhour JR
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1985 Mar; 3(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 3884245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of bacteremia in patients receiving antimicrobial therapy: an evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device and 16B medium.
    Doern GV; Gantz NM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jul; 18(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 6350353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the antimicrobial removal device when used with the BACTEC blood culture system.
    Strand CL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Dec; 78(6):853-6. PubMed ID: 6756125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical laboratory comparison of the 10-ml isolator blood culture system with BACTEC radiometric blood culture media.
    Kellogg JA; Manzella JP; McConville JH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):618-23. PubMed ID: 6386871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increased detection of staphylococcal bacteremia using an anti-microbial removal device.
    Carlson LG; Tenover FC; Plorde JJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 Oct; 84(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 3898813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to the isolator tube, BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle, and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle and comparison of the BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle to the Isolator tube for recovery of bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi from blood.
    Vetter E; Torgerson C; Feuker A; Hughes J; Harmsen S; Schleck C; Horstmeier C; Roberts G; Cockerill F
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Dec; 39(12):4380-6. PubMed ID: 11724848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is the antimicrobial removal device a cost-effective addition to conventional blood cultures?
    Munro R; Collignon PJ; Sorrell TC; Tomlinson P
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 Mar; 37(3):348-51. PubMed ID: 6421896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical laboratory comparison of a slide blood culture system with a conventional broth system.
    Pfaller MA; Sibley TK; Westfall LM; Hoppe-Bauer JE; Keating MA; Murray PR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Sep; 16(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 6752192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical comparison of lysis-centrifugation and radiometric resin systems for blood culture.
    Brannon P; Kiehn TE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Nov; 24(5):886-7. PubMed ID: 3533992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [An evaluation of antimicrobial removal device to isolate bacteria from bacteremic patients with hematological disorders].
    Nakazawa H; Okamoto S; Murase T; Yoshii Y; Aoki I; Toyama K; Ando Y; Uchida H
    Jpn J Antibiot; 1984 Jul; 37(7):1272-8. PubMed ID: 6436553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Large-scale clinical comparison of the lysis-centrifugation and radiometric systems for blood culture.
    Brannon P; Kiehn TE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 22(6):951-4. PubMed ID: 3905850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.