172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6386866)
1. Evaluation of the Quantum II and Rapid E identification systems.
Murray PR; Gauthier A; Niles A
J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Sep; 20(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 6386866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the API rapid E four-hour system with the API 20E overnight system for the identification of routine clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
Overman TL; Plumley D; Overman SB; Goodman NL
J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):542-5. PubMed ID: 3886691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the automicrobic system Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card.
Davis JR; Stager CE; Wende RD; Qadri SM
J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 14(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 7026606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Kelly MT; Latimer JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 7024296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Micro-ID, the API 20E and the Rapid 20E for same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Appelbaum PC; Jacobs MR; Buick MK; Flanagan MM; Gymer GA
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Oct; 4(5):498-501. PubMed ID: 3905400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of the Eiken and API 20E systems and conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
Castillo CB; Bruckner DA
J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):754-7. PubMed ID: 6490860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A collaborative evaluation of a rapid, semi-automated identification system for gram-negative bacilli: the Quantum II BID.
Stevens M; Henrichsen C; Smith M
J Med Microbiol; 1986 Mar; 21(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 3512840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the API 20E system to identify veterinary Enterobacteriaceae.
Swanson EC; Collins MT
J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Jul; 12(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 6999012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of two commerical methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae--API 20E and the Enterotube--with conventional methods.
Hayek LJ; Willis GW
J Clin Pathol; 1976 Feb; 29(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 777035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the DMS Rapid E system for identification of clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
Keville MW; Doern GV
J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Nov; 20(5):1010-1. PubMed ID: 6392317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product.
O'Hara CM; Rhoden DL; Miller JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Test reproducibility of the API (20E), Enterotube, and Pathotec systems.
Holmes B; Willcox WR; Lapage SP; Malnick H
J Clin Pathol; 1977 Apr; 30(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 323296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of micro-ID and API 20E in rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Gooch WM; Hill GA
J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):885-90. PubMed ID: 7047556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.
Edberg SC; Atkinson B; Chambers C; Moore MH; Palumbo L; Zorzon CF; Singer JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 389946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Quantum II Bacterial Identification System and the AutoMicrobic System for the identification of gram-negative bacilli.
Pfaller MA; Bale MJ; Schulte KR; Koontz FP
J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jan; 23(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 3517034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of API 20E System and Encise Enterotube for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae of animal origin.
Devenish JA; Barnum DA
Can J Comp Med; 1980 Jul; 44(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 7000321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of automated and rapid manual methods for the same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Jorgensen JH; Johnson JE; Alexander GA; Paxson R; Alderson GL
Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Jun; 79(6):683-7. PubMed ID: 6342361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Micro-ID, for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Izard D; Gavini F; Ochin D; Enayeh E; Leclerc H
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1980 Dec; 28(10):681-4. PubMed ID: 7008005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Mastroeni P; Carbone M; Fera MT; Teti G
G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the BBL Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter kit for the identification of water-derived environmental Enterobacteriaceae.
Micklewright IJ; Sartory DP
Lett Appl Microbiol; 1995 Sep; 21(3):160-3. PubMed ID: 7576500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
