These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6386872)

  • 1. Update and evaluation of the AutoMicrobic yeast identification system.
    Land G; Stotler R; Land K; Staneck J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):649-52. PubMed ID: 6386872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Oblack DL; Rhodes JC; Martin WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Feb; 13(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 7009641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Pfaller MA; Preston T; Bale M; Koontz FP; Body BA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 26(10):2054-8. PubMed ID: 3182994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laboratory evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Freeman JW; Rowland RW; Overman SB; Goodman NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):895-8. PubMed ID: 7016913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid bacterial identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli.
    Pfaller MA; Sahm D; O'Hara C; Ciaglia C; Yu M; Yamane N; Scharnweber G; Rhoden D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Jul; 29(7):1422-8. PubMed ID: 1885737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the new API 20C strip for yeast identification against a conventional method.
    Land GA; Harrison BA; Hulme KL; Cooper BH; Byrd JC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Sep; 10(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 385621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
    Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
    Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the ATB 32C, automicrobic system and API 20C using clinical yeast isolates.
    Gutierrez J; Martin E; Lozano C; Coronilla J; Nogales C
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1994; 52(6):443-6. PubMed ID: 7856946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the modified API 20C system for identification of clinically important yeasts.
    Buesching WJ; Kurek K; Roberts GD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 May; 9(5):565-69. PubMed ID: 383742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misidentification of clinical yeast isolates by using the updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card.
    Dooley DP; Beckius ML; Jeffrey BS
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Dec; 32(12):2889-92. PubMed ID: 7883873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multicenter evaluation of the new VITEK 2 advanced colorimetric yeast identification card.
    Hata DJ; Hall L; Fothergill AW; Larone DH; Wengenack NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):1087-92. PubMed ID: 17267631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a modified dye pour-plate auxanographic method for the rapid identification of clinically significant yeasts. Comparison with two commercial systems.
    Weymann LH; Stager CE; Qadri SG; Villarreal A; Qadri SM
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1979 Mar; 167(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 375051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Baxter-MicroScan 4-hour enzyme-based yeast identification system.
    Land GA; Salkin IF; el-Zaatari M; McGinnis MR; Hashem G
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Apr; 29(4):718-22. PubMed ID: 1653786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research on rapid identification of auto-microbiology system for pathogenic yeast.
    Liao WQ; Zhao ZQ; Zhao H
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1992 Apr; 105(4):319-21. PubMed ID: 1618016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system, a new method of clinical yeast identification.
    Davey KG; Chant PM; Downer CS; Campbell CK; Warnock DW
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Sep; 48(9):807-9. PubMed ID: 7490311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid identification of yeasts by semi-automated and conventional methods.
    Qadri SM; Flournoy DJ; Qadri SG; Ramirez EG
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1986; 175(5):307-16. PubMed ID: 3762492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of yeasts.
    Hasyn JJ; Buckley HR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Nov; 16(5):901-4. PubMed ID: 6759531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the updated Vitek yeast identification data base.
    el-Zaatari M; Pasarell L; McGinnis MR; Buckner J; Land GA; Salkin IF
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Sep; 28(9):1938-41. PubMed ID: 2229376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.