These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6387783)

  • 1. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent.
    Bettmann MA; Bourdillon PD; Barry WH; Brush KA; Levin DC
    Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):583-7. PubMed ID: 6387783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents.
    Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Bhargava V; Stein JB; Lew W; Slutsky RA; Shabetai R; Higgins CB
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of intravenous administration of ionic and nonionic contrast materials. Implications for deriving physiologic measurements from computed tomography and digital cardiovascular imaging.
    Higgins CB; Gerber KH; Mattrey RF; Slutsky RA
    Radiology; 1982 Mar; 142(3):681-6. PubMed ID: 7063684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative effects of ionic and nonionic contrast materials on indexes of isovolumic contraction and relaxation in humans.
    Mancini GB; Atwood JE; Bhargava V; Slutsky RA; Grover M; Higgins CB
    Am J Cardiol; 1984 Jan; 53(1):228-33. PubMed ID: 6691265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Omnipaque and Urografin in left ventriculography and coronary arteriography. A randomised, double blind study.
    Folke K; Andrew E; Laulund S; Hansen PF
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Apr; 58(688):319-23. PubMed ID: 3904899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of an ionic with a nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Results of a multicenter trial.
    Bettmann MA; Higgins CB
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S70-4. PubMed ID: 3882619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of contrast media on cultured myocardial cells.
    Davis WL; Nelson JA; Barry WH
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):626-30. PubMed ID: 3744737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography.
    Reagan K; Bettman MA; Finkelstein J; Ganz P; Grassi CJ
    Radiology; 1988 May; 167(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 3282261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of a new nonionic and a conventional ionic contrast agent on coronary sinus ionized calcium and left ventricular hemodynamics in dogs.
    Bourdillon PD; Bettmann MA; McCracken S; Poole-Wilson PA; Grossman W
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Oct; 6(4):845-53. PubMed ID: 4031299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamic effects of contrast media during coronary angiography: a comparison of three nonionic agents to Hypaque-76.
    Piao ZE; Murdock DK; Hwang MH; Raymond RM; Scanlon PJ
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1988; 14(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 3349517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents in cardiac catheterization: the effects of ventriculography and coronary arteriography on hemodynamics, electrocardiography, and serum creatinine.
    Cooper MW; Reed PJ
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Apr; 22(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 1781822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects.
    Higgins CB; Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Shaw D
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():111-4. PubMed ID: 6591736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects of ioversol during cardiac angiography. Comparison with iopamidol and diatrizoate.
    Hirshfeld JW; Wieland J; Davis CA; Giles BD; Passione D; Ray MB; Ripley NS
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Feb; 24(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 2645244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative trial of iohexol 350, a non-ionic contrast medium, with diatrizoate (Urografin 370) in left ventriculography and coronary arteriography.
    Sullivan ID; Wainwright RJ; Reidy JF; Sowton E
    Br Heart J; 1984 Jun; 51(6):643-7. PubMed ID: 6375703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantages of nonionic contrast agents in adult urography.
    Dray RJ; Winfield AC; Muhletaler CA; Kirchner FK
    Urology; 1984 Sep; 24(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 6382739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate in cerebral angiography.
    Kido DK; Morris TW; Ekholm S; Plassche W; Erickson JL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():142-6. PubMed ID: 6591738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Iohexol for excretory urography: a comparative study.
    Winfield AC; Dray RJ; Kirchner FK; Muhletaler CA; Price RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Sep; 141(3):571-3. PubMed ID: 6349311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography.
    Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Chiu D; Akin JR; Hu C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Iohexol compared to urografin meglumine in cerebral angiography. A randomized, double blind cross-over study.
    Ahlgren P
    Neuroradiology; 1982; 23(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 7121808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.