These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6388610)
1. The role of platinum matrix in porcelain jacket crowns. Piddock V; Marquis PM; Wilson HJ Br Dent J; 1984 Oct; 157(8):275-80. PubMed ID: 6388610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Study of strengthening and stress distribution of porcelain jacket crowns constructed with twin foil technique. 2nd report]. Ukon S; Matsuura T; Ogata T; Akagi K; Matsuura T; Inoue Y Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 33(2):313-22. PubMed ID: 2489566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The mechanical strength and microstructure of all-ceramic crowns. Piddock V; Marquis PM; Wilson HJ J Dent; 1987 Aug; 15(4):153-8. PubMed ID: 3312325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of the strength of aluminous porcelain jacket crowns constructed with the conventional and twin foil technique. Munoz CA; Goodacre CJ; Moore BK; Dykema RW J Prosthet Dent; 1982 Sep; 48(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 6750090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A two-die system for constructing porcelain jacket crowns. Schmitt SM J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Feb; 51(2):195-8. PubMed ID: 6366207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors affecting the fit of porcelain jacket crowns. Alkumru H; Hullah WR; Marquis PM; Wilson HJ Br Dent J; 1988 Jan; 164(2):39-43. PubMed ID: 3277652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Marginal fit of collarless metal-ceramic crowns: scanning electron microscopy study]. Lee SH Taehan Chikkwa Uisa Hyophoe Chi; 1985 Jul; 23(7):585-91. PubMed ID: 3903006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the strengths of aluminous porcelain fired on to platinum and palladium foils. Piddock V; Marquis PM; Wilson HJ J Oral Rehabil; 1986 Jan; 13(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 3511196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structure-property relationships of dental porcelains used in jacket crowns. Piddock V; Marquis PM; Wilson HJ Br Dent J; 1984 Jun; 156(11):395-8. PubMed ID: 6587889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The fit of molded all-ceramic, twin foil, and conventional ceramic crowns. Brukl CE; Philp GK J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Oct; 58(4):408-13. PubMed ID: 3312577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the fracture strengths of ceramometal crowns versus several all-ceramic crowns. Miller A; Long J; Miller B; Cole J J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 1403916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A technique for the production of standard test specimens of aluminous dental porcelain. Hussain MA; Bradford EW; Charlton G J Oral Rehabil; 1981 Mar; 8(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 7014800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of firing shrinkage on the marginal fit of porcelain jacket crowns. Lui JL Br Dent J; 1980 Jul; 149(2):43-5. PubMed ID: 6992816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of the strength of aluminous porcelain jacket crowns constructed with the conventional and twin foil technique. J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Jun; 49(6):865-7. PubMed ID: 6348268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal accuracy of metal ceramic restorations with porcelain facial margins. Boyle JJ; Naylor WP; Blackman RB J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Jan; 69(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 8455163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]