These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6389186)
1. Conventional and simplified microsurgical isthmic tubal anastomosis compared in the rabbit. Nelson LM Fertil Steril; 1984 Dec; 42(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 6389186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Functional aspects of healing in microsurgical tubal anastomosis--experimental studies of the rabbit fallopian tube]. Gauwerky JF; Vetter H; Bastert G Zentralbl Gynakol; 1992; 114(9):450-4. PubMed ID: 1414072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absorbable or nonabsorbable suture material for microsurgical tubal anastomosis. Randomized experimental study on rabbits. Scheidel PH; Wallwiener DR; Holländer D; Hepp HK Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1986; 21(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 3957133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of lengthening the fallopian tube on fertility in the rabbit. Bateman BG; Eddy CA; Kitchin JD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Nov; 147(5):569-73. PubMed ID: 6638100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of fallopian tube length on fertility in the rabbit. McComb P; Gomel V Fertil Steril; 1979 Jun; 31(6):673-6. PubMed ID: 446793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current approach to tubal anastomosis. DeCherney A; Mezer H Obstet Gynecol Annu; 1985; 14():277-87. PubMed ID: 3157075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Morphology and fertility after re-anastomosis of the rabbit fallopian tube with fibrin glue. Gauwerky JF; Kubli F; Forssmann WG Hum Reprod; 1988 Apr; 3(3):327-30. PubMed ID: 3372695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between tubouterine implantation and tubouterine anastomosis for repair of cornual occlusion. Fayez JA Microsurgery; 1987; 8(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 3306254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization: a review. Perone N Tex Med; 1982 Nov; 78(11):47-54. PubMed ID: 6758174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reversal of sterilization by microsurgical technique. Gaspari AL; Ortensi A; Parlangeli V; Pellizzari G; Setti C; Lania M Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1988; 15(1-2):18-20. PubMed ID: 3359640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microsurgery for tubal reconstruction following Falope-Ring sterilization in swine. Rock JA; Rosenwaks Z; Adashi EY; Jones HW; King TM J Microsurg; 1979; 1(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 16317930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fertility outcome after laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis. Yoon TK; Sung HR; Cha SH; Lee CN; Cha KY Fertil Steril; 1997 Jan; 67(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 8986677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A single continuous suture as a possible alternative to the interrupted suture for tubal anastomosis. Hurwitz A; Amir G; Yagel S; Palti Z; Adoni A Int J Fertil; 1990; 35(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 1970982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrophysiology of the rabbit oviduct following tubal microsurgery. Archer DR; Eddy CA; Pauerstein CJ Fertil Steril; 1979 Apr; 31(4):423-7. PubMed ID: 428589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]