These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6390897)
1. Finite amplitude distortion of the pulsed fields used in diagnostic ultrasound. Bacon DR Ultrasound Med Biol; 1984; 10(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 6390897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two theoretical models for predicting non-linear propagation in medical ultrasound fields. Bacon DR; Baker AC Phys Med Biol; 1989 Nov; 34(11):1633-43. PubMed ID: 2685835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic streaming generated by a focused Gaussian beam and finite amplitude tonebursts. Wu J; Du G Ultrasound Med Biol; 1993; 19(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 8516962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling of pulsed finite-amplitude focused sound beams in time domain. Tavakkoli J; Cathignol D; Souchon R; Sapozhnikov OA J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2061-72. PubMed ID: 10491689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occurrence of transient cavitation in pulsed sawtooth ultrasonic fields. Aymé EJ; Carstensen EL J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Nov; 84(5):1598-605. PubMed ID: 3145294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finite difference modelling of the temperature rise in non-linear medical ultrasound fields. Divall SA; Humphrey VF Ultrasonics; 2000 Mar; 38(1-8):273-7. PubMed ID: 10829673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The development of harmonic distortion in pulsed finite-amplitude ultrasound passing through liver. Starritt HC; Duck FA; Hawkins AJ; Humphrey VF Phys Med Biol; 1986 Dec; 31(12):1401-9. PubMed ID: 3809241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of ultrasound exposure in therapy and pulsed Doppler fields. Starritt HC; Duck FA Br J Radiol; 1992 Jul; 65(775):557-63. PubMed ID: 1515889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An experimental investigation of streaming in pulsed diagnostic ultrasound beams. Starritt HC; Duck FA; Humphrey VF Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15(4):363-73. PubMed ID: 2527429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New approaches to the linear propagation of acoustic fields. Christopher PT; Parker KJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):507-21. PubMed ID: 1880299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are hydrophones of diameter 0.5 mm small enough to characterise diagnostic ultrasound equipment? Smith RA Phys Med Biol; 1989 Nov; 34(11):1593-607. PubMed ID: 2685834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A numerical study of the effect of drive level on the intensity loss from an ultrasonic beam. Baker AC Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(7):1083-8. PubMed ID: 9330451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FDTD simulation of finite-amplitude pressure and temperature fields for biomedical ultrasound. Hallaj IM; Cleveland RO J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):L7-12. PubMed ID: 10335650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simulation of ultrasonic pulse propagation, distortion, and attenuation in the human chest wall. Mast TD; Hinkelman LM; Metlay LA; Orr MJ; Waag RC J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3665-77. PubMed ID: 10615705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cavitation induced by asymmetric, distorted pulses of ultrasound: a biological test. Aymé EJ; Carstensen EL Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 2922882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating in situ exposure in the presence of acoustic nonlinearity. Duck FA J Ultrasound Med; 1999 Jan; 18(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 9952079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]