These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6391638)

  • 1. Comparison of lecture presentation versus computer managed instruction.
    Day R; Payne L
    Comput Nurs; 1984; 2(6):236-40. PubMed ID: 6391638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of CDs and chewing gum in teaching dental anatomy.
    Allen KL; Galvis D; Katz RV
    N Y State Dent J; 2006; 72(4):30-3. PubMed ID: 16925010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative assessment of interactive videodisc instruction.
    Froman RD; Hence C; Neafsey PJ
    Comput Nurs; 1993; 11(5):236-41. PubMed ID: 8402378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized controlled trial of simulation-based teaching versus traditional instruction in medicine: a pilot study among clinical medical students.
    Gordon JA; Shaffer DW; Raemer DB; Pawlowski J; Hurford WE; Cooper JB
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2006 Feb; 11(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 16583282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of computer assisted instruction and small-group review in teaching clinical calculation.
    Gilbert DA; Kolacz NG
    Comput Nurs; 1993; 11(2):72-7. PubMed ID: 8457937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-assisted instruction versus traditional lecture for medical student teaching of dermatology morphology: a randomized control trial.
    Jenkins S; Goel R; Morrell DS
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 59(2):255-9. PubMed ID: 18499299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing and evaluating lecture, dissection and multi-media tutorial methods in Gross Anatomy.
    Jones NA; Sutin J
    Annu Conf Res Med Educ; 1977; 16():344-6. PubMed ID: 343699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in teaching nursing students about congenital heart disease.
    Rouse DP
    Comput Nurs; 2000; 18(6):282-7. PubMed ID: 11105402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Equivalence study of a dental anatomy computer-assisted learning program.
    Bogacki RE; Best A; Abbey LM
    J Dent Educ; 2004 Aug; 68(8):867-71. PubMed ID: 15286110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Case-based learning for orofacial pain and temporomandibular disorders.
    Clark GT; Koyano K; Nivichanov A
    J Dent Educ; 1993 Nov; 57(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 8245294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New educational technology.
    Sinz EH; Taekman JM
    Int Anesthesiol Clin; 2008; 46(4):137-50. PubMed ID: 18849740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided vs. tutor-delivered teaching of exposure therapy for phobia/panic: randomized controlled trial with pre-registration nursing students.
    Gega L; Norman IJ; Marks IM
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Mar; 44(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 16631177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recertification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A comparison of two teaching methods.
    Fabius DB; Grissom EL; Fuentes A
    J Nurs Staff Dev; 1994; 10(5):262-8. PubMed ID: 7807254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative evaluation of teaching methods in an introductory neuroscience course for physical therapy students.
    Willett GM; Sharp JG; Smith LM
    J Allied Health; 2008; 37(3):e177-98. PubMed ID: 19753397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of a computer assisted instructional program on physical therapy students.
    Kinney P; Keskula DR; Perry JF
    J Allied Health; 1997; 26(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 9268782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-assisted instruction in health education: a pilot study.
    Rubinson LG; Robinson JA
    Int J Instr Media; 1977-1978; 5(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 10307654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The potentials and prospects of modern teaching and testing methods in training students and physicians in oncology].
    Chissov VI; Gantsev ShKh; Lar'ialova SL; Starinskiĭ VV; Korsunskiĭ GB
    Vopr Onkol; 1995; 41(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 7483428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of two methods of teaching. Computer managed instruction and keypad questions versus traditional classroom lecture.
    Halloran L
    Comput Nurs; 1995; 13(6):285-8. PubMed ID: 8529142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The individualization of student instruction in a histology department at the current stage of college development].
    Taskaev II; Semchenko VV
    Morfologiia; 1999; 116(6):88-9. PubMed ID: 10709208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of a computer and pencil and paper assignment.
    Gibbons C; Bachulis A; Allen G
    Comput Nurs; 1999; 17(6):286-90. PubMed ID: 10609403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.