149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6392160)
1. A double-blind comparative study of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 in aortography and visceral arteriography.
Barth KH; Mertens MA
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S323-5. PubMed ID: 6392160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin 60 in peripheral arteriography.
Sacks BA; Ellison HP; Bartek S; Vine HS; Palestrant AM
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S320-2. PubMed ID: 6392159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A double-blind clinical study comparing tolerability, safety, and efficacy of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous subtraction angiography.
Nelson JA; Sherry RA
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S366-7. PubMed ID: 6392166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of hexabrix and Renografin 60 in peripheral arteriography.
Sacks BA; Ellison HP; Bartek S; Vine HS; Palestrant AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 May; 140(5):975-7. PubMed ID: 6601445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Double-blind comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 in computed tomography.
Berland LL
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S376-7. PubMed ID: 6392168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A double-blind clinical comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
Turski PA; Gentry LR; Matozzi F; Verma S
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S363-5. PubMed ID: 6392165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A double-blind clinical study comparing the safety and efficacy of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 in contrast enhanced computed body tomography.
McClennan BL; Lee JK; DiSantis DJ; James M
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S378-84. PubMed ID: 6392169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A double-blind clinical comparison of the electrophysiologic adverse effects of Hexabrix and Renografin-76.
Wolf GL
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S328-32. PubMed ID: 6392161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A double-blind randomized clinical study of the use of Hexabrix in pediatric angiocardiography.
Tonkin IL
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S344-9. PubMed ID: 6392164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 following left ventriculography and coronary arteriography.
Svenson RH
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S333-4. PubMed ID: 6392162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-60 in knee arthrography.
Apple JS; Martinez S; Khoury MB; Royster R; Allen S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jul; 145(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 3873834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preliminary evaluation of Hexabrix for temporomandibular joint arthrography.
Katzberg RW
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S387-8. PubMed ID: 6392170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast media tonicity. Part II. Isotonic ioxaglate vs. standard renografin for IV-DSA evaluation of the carotid bifurcation, a double-blind prospective clinical trial.
Burbank FH; Bradley BR; Yegnashankaran S; Enzmann DR
Invest Radiol; 1986 Apr; 21(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 3516921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of pain and heat sensation of contrast media in aortofemoral angiography: meglumine-amidotrizoate (Angiografin) mixed with lidocaine versus sodium-meglumine-ioxaglate (Hexabrix).
Heystraten FM; van den Berg FG; Mulderije ED
Diagn Imaging; 1983; 52(2-3):141-4. PubMed ID: 6851813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A double-blind randomized clinical study of the safety, tolerability and efficacy of Hexabrix in pediatric angiocardiography.
Anthony CL; Tonkin IL; Marin-Garcia J; Paul RN; Bell ED; Brooks E; Eastham ED; Fowler SL
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S335-43. PubMed ID: 6392163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hexabrix as a contrast agent for hysterosalpingography.
Winfield AC; Maxson WS; Harding DR; Diggs J; Wentz AC
Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):232-3. PubMed ID: 6729127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The optimal concentration of contrast medium for aortography and femoral arteriography: a comparison of Hexabrix 320 and Hexabrix 250.
Grainger RG
Clin Radiol; 1986 May; 37(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 3519053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporomandibular joint arthrography: comparison of morbidity with ionic and low osmolality contrast media.
Katzberg RW; Miller TL; Hayakawa K; Manzione JV; Tallents RH
Radiology; 1985 Apr; 155(1):245-6. PubMed ID: 3883421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical comparison of Hexabrix, iopamidol, and Urografin-60 in whole body computed tomography.
Spataro RF; Fischer HW; Kormano M
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S372-5. PubMed ID: 6511276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The haemodynamic effects of left ventriculography in coronary artery disease and mitral valve disease: a comparison of high and low osmolality contrast media.
Fraser AG; Culling W; Singh H; Ruttley MS; Newcombe RG
Eur Heart J; 1984 Sep; 5(9):727-34. PubMed ID: 6389137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
