These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6394615)
1. Reproducibility of the MS-2 system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a collaborative study with blindly assigned reference stains. Yamane N; Kato H; Saitoh Y; Mukojima T; Matsuoka K J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Dec; 20(6):1135-9. PubMed ID: 6394615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the updated MS-2 Bacterial Identification system in comparison with the API 20E system. DiPersio JR; Dyke JW; Vannest RD J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jul; 18(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 6350342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical laboratory evaluation of the automicrobic system Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card. Davis JR; Stager CE; Wende RD; Qadri SM J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 14(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 7026606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the MS-2 system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. McCracken AW; Martin WJ; McCarthy LR; Schwab DA; Cooper BH; Helgeson NG; Prowant S; Robson J J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):684-9. PubMed ID: 7024299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of RapID onE system for identification of 379 strains in the family Enterobacteriaceae and oxidase-negative, gram-negative nonfermenters. Kitch TT; Jacobs MR; Appelbaum PC J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Apr; 32(4):931-4. PubMed ID: 8027345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multipoint identification of Enterobacteriaceae: report of the British Society for Microbial Technology collaborative study. Winstanley TG; Limb DI; Wheat PF; Nicol CD J Clin Pathol; 1993 Jul; 46(7):637-41. PubMed ID: 8157751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Molecular characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility of extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates at a tertiary-care centre in Monterrey, Mexico. Garza-González E; Mendoza Ibarra SI; Llaca-Díaz JM; Gonzalez GM J Med Microbiol; 2011 Jan; 60(Pt 1):84-90. PubMed ID: 20930052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the four-hour Micro-ID technique for direct identification of oxidase-negative, Gram-negative rods from blood cultures. Appelbaum PC; Schick SF; Kellogg JA J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Oct; 12(4):533-7. PubMed ID: 6999020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae by use of semiautomated microbiology systems and manual detection procedures. Wiegand I; Geiss HK; Mack D; Stürenburg E; Seifert H J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):1167-74. PubMed ID: 17287329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simplified scheme for identification of prompt lactose-fermenting members of the Enterobacteriaceae. Hicks MJ; Ryan KJ J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Dec; 4(6):511-4. PubMed ID: 794078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biochemical characteristics and identification of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from meats. Stiles ME; Ng LK Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 41(3):639-45. PubMed ID: 7013705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biochemical differentiation of the Enterobacteriaceae with the aid of lysine-iron-agar. Johnson JG; Kunz LJ; Barron W; Ewing WH Appl Microbiol; 1966 Mar; 14(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 5335386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accurate automated identification of selected Enterobacteriaceae at four hours. Ferraro MJ; Edelblut MA; Kunz LJ J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 7007419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli. O'Hara CM J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli from BACTEC bottles by use of the MS-2 system with updated bacterial identification software. Dipersio JR; Ficorilli SM; Varga FJ J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Dec; 20(6):1202-4. PubMed ID: 6394624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of the minitek differential system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Finklea PJ; Cole MS; Sodeman TM J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Nov; 4(5):400-4. PubMed ID: 791964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Enteric-Tek system for identifying Enterobacteriaceae. Esaias AO; Rhoden DL; Smith PB J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Mar; 15(3):419-24. PubMed ID: 7042744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Kelly MT; Latimer JM J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 7024296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of three methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appelbaum PC; Arthur RR; Parker ME; Shugar GL; von Kuster LC; Charache P Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 1(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 6756905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA relatedness among species of Enterobacter and Serratia. Steigerwalt AG; Fanning GR; Fife-Asbury MA; Brenner DJ Can J Microbiol; 1976 Feb; 22(2):121-37. PubMed ID: 1260520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]