These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6394724)

  • 1. Production of test blocks duplicated by electroforming for detail reproduction of impressions made with impression materials.
    Nishiyama M; Kaketani M; Matsudaira S; Ohashi M
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1984 Sep; 26(3):211-37. PubMed ID: 6394724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional measurement of stone cast deformation. Part 2. Effects of types of impression material and mold on the dimensional stability of stone casts.
    Habu H; Kobayashi K
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1986 Mar; 28(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 3519890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Detailed reproductions of impressions made with impression materials. 1. Products of test blocks duplicated by electroforming].
    Nishiyama M; Matsudaira S; Kaketani M; Sugawara A; Numechika T; Ohashi M
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1984 Sep; 3(5):588-604. PubMed ID: 6395402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
    Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of disinfecting alginate and addition cured silicone rubber impression materials on the physical properties of impressions and resultant casts.
    al-Omari WM; Jones JC; Wood DJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Sep; 6(3):103-10. PubMed ID: 10218014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Surfaces of stone models made in elastic material impression. II. Stone model surfaces set against synthetic rubber impressions].
    Daito K
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1972 Dec; 39(4):597-610. PubMed ID: 4513389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
    Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional changes and pressure of dental stones set in silicone rubber impressions.
    Teraoka F; Takahashi J
    Dent Mater; 2000 Mar; 16(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 11203536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Surfaces of stone models made by the laminated single impression technique with silicone materials (author's transl)].
    Daito K; Miyauchi H; Okuno T; Mitani S; Takatsu T
    Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Jun; 31(2):27-31. PubMed ID: 4620680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy, detail reproduction, and hardness of gypsum casts produced from silicone impressions treated with glow discharge.
    Fernandes CP; Vassilakos N
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Nov; 70(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 8254551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of disposable and custom-made impression trays on the accuracy of impressions.
    Burton JF; Hood JA; Plunkett DJ; Johnson SS
    J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):121-3. PubMed ID: 2671076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A historical review of hydrocolloids and an investigation of the dimensional accuracy of the new alginates for crown and bridge impressions when using stock trays.
    Hansson O; Eklund J
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(2):81-95. PubMed ID: 6377548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface reproducibility of resin die materials with various impression materials.
    Kozono Y; Kakigawa H; Tajima K; Hayashi I
    Dent Mater J; 1983 Dec; 2(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 6586349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distortion analysis of stone casts made from impression materials.
    Linke BA; Nicholls JI; Faucher RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Dec; 54(6):794-802. PubMed ID: 3908660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Dimensional variations observed in finished replicas from wash technic impressions and metallo-resin crowns].
    Simon-Grivegnee A; Grimonster J
    Cah Prothese; 1982 Jan; 10(37):49-70. PubMed ID: 6764742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of four different die materials before and after disinfection of the impression: an in vitro study.
    Nandini Y; Vinitha KB; Manvi S; Smitha M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):668-74. PubMed ID: 24309347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.