These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

580 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6394984)

  • 21. [Scanning electron microscopic studies of tooth surfaces after the manual removal of dental calculus and concretion].
    Mayer R
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1982 Aug; 37(8):644-8. PubMed ID: 6751792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [An ultrastructural study of root surfaces after scaling].
    Gianni E; Salvato A; Loiaconi G; Mattei R
    Mondo Odontostomatol; 1984; 26(2):45-52. PubMed ID: 6392858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Determination of the time it takes to do scaling and root planing by ultrasonic instruments, the effect of the sharpness of the tips, the effect of these tips on the cement and the effectiveness of the ultrasonic instruments made in Turkey].
    Kandemir S; Ilgenli T
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1988 Sep; 15(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3078147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of fluorescence-controlled Er:YAG laser radiation, the Vector system and hand instruments on periodontally diseased root surfaces in vivo.
    Schwarz F; Bieling K; Venghaus S; Sculean A; Jepsen S; Becker J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Mar; 33(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 16489946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Efficiency of subgingival calculus removal with the Vector-system compared to ultrasonic scaling and hand instrumentation in vitro.
    Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S
    J Periodontal Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15613079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Ultrasonic root planing. An alternative method versus hand instruments? An in vitro comparison and SEM study].
    van Gogswaardt DC; Behrens VG
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1990; 78(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 2150253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument.
    Busslinger A; Lampe K; Beuchat M; Lehmann B
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 28(7):642-9. PubMed ID: 11422585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A new system to detect residual subgingival calculus: in vitro detection limits.
    Meissner G; Oehme B; Strackeljan J; Kocher T
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Mar; 33(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 16489945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [A comparative SEM study of the tooth surface after removal of dental calculus by hand-held instruments and ultrasound].
    Fassmann A; Hornová J; Sindelka Z; Tomásková L
    Cesk Stomatol; 1981 Jan; 81(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 6938315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Use of the curette and root planing].
    Ceppetelli Caprini B
    Prev Assist Dent; 1990; 16(2):33-4. PubMed ID: 2204047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Er:YAG laser scaling of diseased root surfaces.
    Frentzen M; Braun A; Aniol D
    J Periodontol; 2002 May; 73(5):524-30. PubMed ID: 12027255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scaling and root planing: removal of calculus and subgingival organisms.
    Drisko CL; Killoy WJ
    Curr Opin Dent; 1991 Feb; 1(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 1912636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The impact of research on scaling and root planing.
    O'Leary TJ
    J Periodontol; 1986 Feb; 57(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 3514839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth. (I) Residual deposits.
    Kocher T; Langenbeck M; Rühling A; Plagmann HC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 27(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 10783837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Comparative efficiency of 3 experimental ultrasonic instruments in vivo].
    Roig R
    J Parodontol; 1990 Sep; 9(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 2231394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Subgingival debridement with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments and assessment of substance removal on extracted teeth.
    Rühling A; Bernhardt O; Kocher T
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jun; 36(6):446-52. PubMed ID: 15954250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing in calculus removal.
    Rabbani GM; Ash MM; Caffesse RG
    J Periodontol; 1981 Mar; 52(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 7014822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Ultrasonic depurating].
    Jacobson L
    Sven Tandlak Tidskr; 1971 Nov; 64(11):829-38. PubMed ID: 4950446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Total calculus removal: an attainable objective?
    Kepic TJ; O'Leary TJ; Kafrawy AH
    J Periodontol; 1990 Jan; 61(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 2179511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.