These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6395418)

  • 1. Surface texture of stone model setting against elastomer impression materials.
    Nanami T; Ostlund SG
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 6395418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between critical convergence angle and surface defects in stone casts.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Aug; 21(8):675-9. PubMed ID: 2094872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Surfaces of stone models made in elastic material impression. II. Stone model surfaces set against synthetic rubber impressions].
    Daito K
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1972 Dec; 39(4):597-610. PubMed ID: 4513389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Setting expansion of dental stone in hydrophilic addition type silicone impression].
    Kakuta K; Ogura H; Miyagawa Y; Kashiwagi Y
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Sep; 8(5):736-40. PubMed ID: 2490217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The physical properties of silicone impression materials with hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity. Wetting, water absorption, surface structure of dental stone and dimensional change on stone dies].
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Takenaka M; Abe T
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1105-14. PubMed ID: 2135145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Surfaces of stone models made in elastic material impression. II. Stone model surfaces set aginst synthetic rubber impressions].
    Daito K
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1972 Dec; 39(4):597-610. PubMed ID: 4511611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The accuracy of post-impressions with silicone-rubber impression materials and polysulfide-rubber impression materials].
    Aoyama S; Sano Y; Enomoto M; Hanamura N
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1980 Jun; 6(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 6935848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation between the degree of deformation of the stone die and the amount of the master die undercut. Part 1. Single tooth die.
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Takenaka M
    Aichi Gakuin Dent Sci; 1989; 2():57-65. PubMed ID: 2701499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of disinfecting alginate and addition cured silicone rubber impression materials on the physical properties of impressions and resultant casts.
    al-Omari WM; Jones JC; Wood DJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Sep; 6(3):103-10. PubMed ID: 10218014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Reproduction of details of elastomer impression materials--a scanning electron microscopic analysis].
    Marinello CP; Boitel N
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed (1984); 1985 Nov; 95(11):1051-63. PubMed ID: 3909395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effects of removing methods on the deformation of impression--especially of vinyl silicone rubber impression materials immediately after removal].
    Tani T; Kanamori K; Kamiya K; Mizuno T; Asai T; Kondo M; Senda A
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1986 Jun; 24(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 3538927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Surfaces of stone models made by the laminated single impression technique with silicone materials (author's transl)].
    Daito K; Miyauchi H; Okuno T; Mitani S; Takatsu T
    Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Jun; 31(2):27-31. PubMed ID: 4620680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Reliability of silicone elastomer for impressions].
    Deyrolle G
    Inf Dent; 1975 Oct; 57(41):45-50. PubMed ID: 801831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of the type and technique used for impression making on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Habib AN; Shehata MT
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Oct; 41(4):1409-16. PubMed ID: 9497690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Changes in the shape and dimensions of stone dies in relation to various materials and methods of preparation].
    Sandig C
    Protet Stomatol; 1981; 31(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 7036222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Dimensional change and deformation on stone dies for full cast crowns. Differences according to impression methods using vinyl silicone impression materials].
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Watanabe M; Tejima R; Takigawa T
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1989 Jun; 27(2):429-40. PubMed ID: 2700283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.