These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6396304)

  • 21. Validation of the angiographic accuracy of digital left ventriculography.
    Nichols AB; Martin EC; Fles TP; Stugensky KM; Balancio LA; Casarella WJ; Weiss MB
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Jan; 51(1):224-30. PubMed ID: 6849261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Exercise radionuclide ejection fraction: correlation with exercise contrast ventriculography.
    Brady TJ; Lo K; Thrall JH; Walton JA; Brymer JF; Pitt B
    Radiology; 1979 Sep; 132(3):703-5. PubMed ID: 472251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Radionuclide ventriculographic evaluation of left ventricular systolic function in acute myocardial infarction].
    Ohsuzu F; Hosono K; Nakamura H; Strauss HW
    J Cardiogr Suppl; 1986; (8):43-52. PubMed ID: 3722879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Non-invasive determination of left ventricular ejection fraction using a mobile ECG-triggered scintillation measuring probe. Comparison of cineventriculography, echocardiography and radionuclide ventriculography].
    Brüggemann T; Schwietzer U; von Leitner ER; Kruck I; Koppenhagen K; Reuter E; Biamino G
    Z Kardiol; 1984 Jan; 73(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 6702250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantitative axial oblique contrast left ventriculography: validation of the method by demonstrating improved visualization of regional wall motion and mitral valve function with accurate volume determinations.
    Rogers WJ; Smith LR; Bream PR; Elliott LP; Rackley CE; Russell RO
    Am Heart J; 1982 Feb; 103(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 7055053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Evaluation of left ventricular volume and wall motion by digital intravenous subtraction angiography: comparison with conventional left ventriculography].
    Ohgitani N; Sheu TW; Taniura T; Satoh K
    Kokyu To Junkan; 1987 Jun; 35(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 3306857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the densitometric method of ejection fraction by direct digital subtraction left ventriculography.
    Shiba K; Nanki M; Hori H; Sakamoto N
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 May; 23(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 1863965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital subtraction intravenous left ventricular angiography: comparison with conventional intraventricular angiography.
    Goldberg HL; Borer JS; Moses JW; Fisher J; Cohen B; Skelly NT
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Mar; 1(3):858-62. PubMed ID: 6338086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease assessed by gated tomographic myocardial perfusion images. Comparison with assessment by contrast ventriculography and first-pass radionuclide angiography.
    Williams KA; Taillon LA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):173-81. PubMed ID: 8522692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Videodensitometric ejection fractions from intravenous digital subtraction left ventriculograms: correlation with conventional direct contrast and radionuclide ventriculography.
    Detrano R; MacIntyre WJ; Salcedo EE; O'Donnell J; Underwood DA; Simpfendorfer C; Go RT; Jones H; Butters K; Leatherman J
    Radiology; 1985 Apr; 155(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 3883414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Peak rate of left-ventricular ejection by a gated radionuclide technique: correlation with contrast angiography.
    Bhargava V; Slutsky R; Costello D
    J Nucl Med; 1981 Jun; 22(6):506-9. PubMed ID: 7229722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Detection of left ventricular wall motion abnormalities for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a comparison of exercise radionuclide and pacing intravenous digital ventriculography.
    Wasserman AG; Johnson RA; Katz RJ; Leiboff RH; Bren GB; Varghese PJ; Ross AM
    Am J Cardiol; 1984 Sep; 54(6):497-501. PubMed ID: 6475766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function in ischemic heart disease using ultrafast computed tomography.
    MacMillan RM; Rees MR; Weiner R; Maranhao V
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1988; 14(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 3396067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of segmental left ventricular wall motion by equilibrium gated radionuclide ventriculography.
    Van Nostrand D; Janowitz WR; Holmes DR; Cohen HA
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1979; 5(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 498260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of cardiac wall motion with the ejection fraction image: a comparison with contrast left ventriculography.
    Nakajima K; Tonami N; Bunko H; Maeda T; Hisada K; Asanoi H; Ikeda T
    Clin Nucl Med; 1981 Oct; 6(10):481-4. PubMed ID: 6271439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Phase and amplitude images using Fourier analysis in radioisotopic angiography. Comparison with contrast angiography for studying regional changes in ventricular contraction].
    Verna E; Casucci R; Garancini S; Repetto S; Binaghi G; Roncari G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 15(2):184-92. PubMed ID: 4007368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Quantitative analysis of the left ventricular volume curve by digital subtraction angiography].
    Ikeda H
    J Cardiol Suppl; 1987; 15():27-33. PubMed ID: 3334250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical application of monitoring techniques: radioisotopic methods.
    Parodi O; Marzullo P; Neglia D; Marcassa C; L'Abbate A
    Can J Cardiol; 1986 Jul; Suppl A():155A-162A. PubMed ID: 3756580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Feasibility, reliability, and advantage of utilizing low contrast dose digital subtraction ventriculography in a conventional catheterization laboratory.
    Denardo SJ; Anderson DJ; Gould RG; Lipton MJ; Brundage BH; Ports TA
    Am Heart J; 1985 Sep; 110(3):631-6. PubMed ID: 3898796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantitative assessment of segmental wall motion abnormalities at rest and after atrial pacing using digital intravenous ventriculography.
    Mancini GB; Norris SL; Peterson KL; Gregoratos G; Widmann TF; Ashburn WL; Higgins CB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Jul; 2(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 6853919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.