These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6396346)

  • 1. [How to take clear impressions of the cervical margins of the abutment teeth].
    Inoue M
    Nihon Shika Ishikai Zasshi; 1984; 37(6):585-9. PubMed ID: 6396346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An accurate, single, platform-level impression technique for the fabrication of prosthetic restorations on dental implants.
    Marder MZ; Marder RW
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Oct; 25(5):495-9. PubMed ID: 16250571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Reproduction of the abutment clearance in casting fixed tooth replacements].
    Lehmann KM; Lindemann J
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 May; 35(5):537-9. PubMed ID: 7004843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The impression accuracy of abutment teeth for full cast crowns with adjacent anterio-posterior teeth].
    Aichi T
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1984 Jun; 84(6):925-47. PubMed ID: 6397865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A technique for crown and bridge abutment impressions and master cast construction.
    Cichino PH
    Dent Dig; 1971 Nov; 77(11):644-9. PubMed ID: 4939924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developing an optimal emergence profile of the definitive restoration with a modified impression cap technique for ITI solid abutment.
    Kuo SB; Hong HH; Tsai TP; Shen YF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12488861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scans of stone models and impressions using a blue LED scanner.
    Jeon JH; Jung ID; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
    Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(5):686-91. PubMed ID: 26438993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hydraulic implant abutment level impressions.
    Hoos JC; Kaplowitz GJ
    Tex Dent J; 2003 Sep; 120(9):888-9. PubMed ID: 14560463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative study of inter-abutment distance of dies made from full arch dual-arch impression trays with those made from full arch stock trays: an in vitro study.
    Reddy JM; Prashanti E; Kumar GV; Suresh Sajjan MC; Mathew X
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 20139562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The suitability of head-of-implant and conventional abutment impression techniques for implant-retained three unit bridges: an in vitro study.
    Bartlett DW; Greenwood R; Howe L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):163-6. PubMed ID: 12526273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Preparation of cast crowns for abutment teeth].
    Schomburg W
    Quintessenz; 1973 Jan; 24(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 4596549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts.
    Kim S; Nicholls JI; Han CH; Lee KW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 17066636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth.
    Beier US; Kranewitter R; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 19418859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Method to simplify a direct implant impression using an extended guide pin.
    Jung SR; Bashutski JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Aug; 104(2):137-8. PubMed ID: 20654771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the accuracy of two removable die systems with intact working casts.
    Aramouni P; Millstein P
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):533-9. PubMed ID: 8148023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.