These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The new generation amalgam alloys. Clinical considerations. Jordan RE; Suzuki M; Boksman L Dent Clin North Am; 1985 Apr; 29(2):341-58. PubMed ID: 3858165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of composite and amalgam posterior restorations: one year results. Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R J Can Dent Assoc; 1982 Jan; 48(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 7034910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of marginal leakage of amalgam restorations in vitro. vd Veen H; Scholtanus H; Arends J J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 11(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 6585523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conservative preparation designs for Class II amalgam restorations. Sturdevant JR; Taylor DF; Leonard RH; Straka WF; Roberson TM; Wilder AD Dent Mater; 1987 Jun; 3(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 3481588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro assessment of marginal leakage of combined amalgam-sealant restorations on occlusal surfaces of permanent posterior teeth. Fuks AB; Shey Z ASDC J Dent Child; 1983; 50(6):425-9. PubMed ID: 6581182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro evaluation of micromarginal leakage of three filling systems--an autoradiographic analysis using radio isotope S35 as a tracer. Mohandas U; Reddy VV J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1993 Mar; 11(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 8040699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of manipulative variables on porosity and microleakage of amalgam. Hadavi F; Coradazzi JL; Asgar K J Can Dent Assoc; 1988 May; 54(5):343-7. PubMed ID: 3288309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Margin adaptation of dispersion and traditional amalgams with reference to plasticity: a clinical comparison. Matsson L; Ryge G; Weidemanis C; Granath L J Dent Res; 1982 Oct; 61(10):1172-5. PubMed ID: 6749925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors affecting the marginal leakage of amalgam. Mahler DB; Nelson LW J Am Dent Assoc; 1984 Jan; 108(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 6582114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Composites for posterior use. Davidson CL Mondo Odontostomatol; 1986; 28(4):31-40. PubMed ID: 3464838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: three year results. Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 Jun; 50(6):478-80. PubMed ID: 6378338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing the marginal adaptation of amalgam. Eames WB J Am Dent Assoc; 1967 Sep; 75(3):629-37. PubMed ID: 5231548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results. Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of coefficient of thermal expansion on microleakage. Bullard RH; Leinfelder KF; Russell CM J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Jun; 116(7):871-4. PubMed ID: 3164741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage at the etched-amalgam/composite resin interface of etched-metal resin-bonded retainers. Maroney WF; Blank LW; Hargrave JW; Pelleu GB Gen Dent; 1988; 36(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 3280402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]