These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6398924)

  • 21. Is the monitoring of anti-Xa activity necessary in pregnant women undergoing thromboprophylaxis?
    O'Connell MP; O'Leary M; MacKeogh L; Murphy K; Keane DP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 May; 114(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 15099863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Routine hepatitis C virus screening in pregnancy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Plunkett BA; Grobman WA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1153-61. PubMed ID: 15846195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is admission test in labor justified in low-risk women?
    Rasmussen K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Sep; 77(8):873-4. PubMed ID: 9776608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inter-observer variation in assessment of 845 labour admission tests: comparison between midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting and two experts.
    Blix E; Sviggum O; Koss KS; Øian P
    BJOG; 2003 Jan; 110(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12504927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lower genital tract infections among pregnant women: a review.
    Marai W
    East Afr Med J; 2001 Nov; 78(11):581-5. PubMed ID: 12219963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Experiences of pregnant women with information procedures in routine ultrasound examinations].
    Sommerseth E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Apr; 113(10):1218-20. PubMed ID: 8493650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Papanicolaou test in pregnancy].
    Cheng X; Bian X; Lang J; Gai M; Liu X; Zhang J; Liu M
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2000 Apr; 22(2):174-6. PubMed ID: 12903522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Changes in mouse behavior induced by fetal exposure to diagnostic ultrasound.
    Suresh R; Devi PU; Baskar R
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1996 Sep; 34(9):895-7. PubMed ID: 9014530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Screening with meaning? Use of ultrasound in pregnancy].
    Salvesen KA
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Jun; 114(17):1993-4. PubMed ID: 8079332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is a third-trimester antibody screen in Rh+ women necessary?
    Rothenberg JM; Weirermiller B; Dirig K; Hurd WW; Schilder J; Golichowski A
    Am J Manag Care; 1999 Sep; 5(9):1145-50. PubMed ID: 10621080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Serological evidence of Toxoplasma gondii infection among pregnant women in Auckland.
    Morris A; Croxson M
    N Z Med J; 2004 Feb; 117(1189):U770. PubMed ID: 15014559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ultrasound technology: the RADIUS (Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound) study & national policy.
    Huang L
    J Clin Eng; 1994; 19(4):297-309. PubMed ID: 10137111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The commodification of obstetric ultrasound scanning in Hanoi, Viet Nam.
    Gammeltoft T; Nguyen HT
    Reprod Health Matters; 2007 May; 15(29):163-71. PubMed ID: 17512387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Fetal assessment of the labor admission in low risk pregnancies].
    Poulain P; Mercier C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S16-22. PubMed ID: 18191911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the WHO Haemoglobin Colour Scale for diagnosis of anaemia in children and pregnant women as used by primary health care nurses and community health workers in western Kenya.
    Lindblade KA; Mwololo K; van Eijk AM; Peterson E; Odhiambo F; Williamson J; Slutsker L
    Trop Med Int Health; 2006 Nov; 11(11):1679-87. PubMed ID: 17054747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measurable changes in hydronephrosis during pregnancy induced by positional changes: ultrasonic assessment and its diagnostic implication.
    Rajaei Isfahani M; Haghighat M
    Urol J; 2005; 2(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 17629879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Receipt of information and women's attitudes towards ultrasound scanning during pregnancy.
    Whynes DK
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jan; 19(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 11851962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How safe is diagnostic ultrasonography?
    Bly S
    Can Med Assoc J; 1985 Aug; 133(4):268. PubMed ID: 3893672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Safety of diagnostic ultrasonography.
    Eisenberg E
    Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Nov; 131(9):1014, 1016. PubMed ID: 6388777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Experts disagree on routine scanning of pregnant women].
    Jacobsen VF; Bang J
    Sygeplejersken; 1984 Oct; 84(43):22-3. PubMed ID: 6398924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.