These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6399167)

  • 1. Parametric vs nonparametric measurements in tissues with nonlinear frequency dependent attenuation.
    Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1984; 10(6):709-13. PubMed ID: 6399167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the validity of the linear approximation in the parametric measurement of attenuation in tissues.
    Narayana PA; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; 9(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 6649153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attenuation measurement uncertainties caused by speckle statistics.
    Parker KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Sep; 80(3):727-34. PubMed ID: 3531278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro measurement of the frequency-dependent attenuation in cancellous bone between 0.2 and 2 MHz.
    Chaffaï S; Padilla F; Berger G; Laugier P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1281-9. PubMed ID: 11008828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parameter estimation for nonlinear frequency dependent attenuation in soft tissue.
    He P; McGoron A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15(8):757-63. PubMed ID: 2694562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variation of acoustic attenuation coefficient slope estimates for in vivo liver.
    Kuc R; Taylor KJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1982; 8(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 7112726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The measurement of attenuation in nonlinearly attenuating media by the zero crossing method.
    Narayana PA; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1984; 10(6):715-8. PubMed ID: 6536127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance evaluation of the spectral centroid downshift method for attenuation estimation.
    Samimi K; Varghese T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 May; 62(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 25965681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiparametric attenuation and backscatter images for characterization of carotid plaque.
    Bridal SL; Beyssen B; Fornès P; Julia P; Berger G
    Ultrason Imaging; 2000 Jan; 22(1):20-34. PubMed ID: 10823495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attenuation of ultrasound: magnitude and frequency dependence for tissue characterization.
    Parker KJ; Lerner RM; Waag RC
    Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):785-8. PubMed ID: 6387795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Velocity dispersion of acoustic waves in cancellous bone.
    Droin P; Berger G; Laugier P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1998; 45(3):581-92. PubMed ID: 18244210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of the slope of the acoustic attenuation coefficient.
    Shaffer S; Pettibone DW; Havlice JF; Nassi M
    Ultrason Imaging; 1984 Apr; 6(2):126-38. PubMed ID: 6539975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonlinear parameter estimation in water-saturated sandy sediment with difference frequency acoustic wave.
    Kim BN; Yoon SW
    Ultrasonics; 2009 May; 49(4-5):438-45. PubMed ID: 19138778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of a system for ultrasonic imaging of attenuation and texture in soft tissue.
    Salomonsson G; Löfström B
    Ultrason Imaging; 1985 Jul; 7(3):225-43. PubMed ID: 3913098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of ultrasonic parameters based on attenuation and dispersion measurements.
    He P
    Ultrason Imaging; 1998 Oct; 20(4):275-87. PubMed ID: 10197348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Frequency-Dependent Attenuation on Predicted Histotripsy Waveforms in Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms.
    Bader KB; Crowe MJ; Raymond JL; Holland CK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1701-5. PubMed ID: 27108036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tissue Attenuation Estimation by Mean Frequency Downshift and Bandwidth Limitation.
    Klimonda Z; Postema M; Nowicki A; Litniewski J
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Aug; 63(8):1107-15. PubMed ID: 27254862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasonic signal processing for in vivo attenuation measurement: short time Fourier analysis.
    Fink M; Hottier F; Cardoso JF
    Ultrason Imaging; 1983 Apr; 5(2):117-35. PubMed ID: 6683891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo measurement of attenuation.
    Ferrari L; Jones JP; Gonzalez VM
    Ultrasonics; 1986 Mar; 24(2):66-72. PubMed ID: 3952885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.