These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6399170)

  • 1. Ultrasound attenuation measurements of the liver in vivo using a commercial sector scanner.
    Garra BS; Shawker TH; Nassi M; Russell MA
    Ultrason Imaging; 1984 Oct; 6(4):396-407. PubMed ID: 6399170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Studies on frequency-dependent attenuation in the normal liver and spleen and in liver diseases, using the spectral-shift zero-crossing method.
    Itoh K; Yasuda Y; Suzuki O; Itoh H; Itoh T; Tsao JW; Konishi T; Koyano A
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1988 Oct; 16(8):553-62. PubMed ID: 3152399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The acoustic properties, centered on 20 MHZ, of an IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material and its temperature, frequency and age dependence.
    Brewin MP; Pike LC; Rowland DE; Birch MJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1292-306. PubMed ID: 18343021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attenuation of ultrasound in normal liver and diffuse liver disease in vivo.
    Maklad NF; Ophir J; Balsara V
    Ultrason Imaging; 1984 Apr; 6(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 6539974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reference characterisation of sound speed and attenuation of the IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material up to a frequency of 60 MHz.
    Rajagopal S; Sadhoo N; Zeqiri B
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):317-33. PubMed ID: 25220268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differential attenuation imaging for the characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound lesions.
    Ribault M; Chapelon JY; Cathignol D; Gelet A
    Ultrason Imaging; 1998 Jul; 20(3):160-77. PubMed ID: 9921617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scatterer number density considerations in reference phantom-based attenuation estimation.
    Rubert N; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1680-96. PubMed ID: 24726800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new method for attenuation coefficient measurement in the liver: comparison with the spectral shift central frequency method.
    Fujii Y; Taniguchi N; Itoh K; Shigeta K; Wang Y; Tsao JW; Kumasaki K; Itoh T
    J Ultrasound Med; 2002 Jul; 21(7):783-8. PubMed ID: 12099567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vivo ultrasonographic exposimetry: human tissue-specific attenuation coefficients in the gynecologic examination.
    Siddiqi TA; Miodovnik M; Meyer RA; O'Brien WD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr; 180(4):866-74. PubMed ID: 10203654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners.
    Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Madsen EL; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Oct; 34(4):209-21. PubMed ID: 23160474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasound backscatter and attenuation in human liver with diffuse disease.
    Lu ZF; Zagzebski JA; Lee FT
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Sep; 25(7):1047-54. PubMed ID: 10574336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In-vivo measurements of ultrasound attenuation in normal or diseased liver.
    Parker KJ; Asztely MS; Lerner RM; Schenk EA; Waag RC
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 3279691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of ultrasonic attenuation with pathologic fat and fibrosis in liver disease.
    Lin T; Ophir J; Potter G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14(8):729-34. PubMed ID: 3062866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative US attenuation in normal liver and in patients with diffuse liver disease: importance of fat.
    Taylor KJ; Riely CA; Hammers L; Flax S; Weltin G; Garcia-Tsao G; Conn HO; Kuc R; Barwick KW
    Radiology; 1986 Jul; 160(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 3520657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental Measurements of Ultrasound Attenuation in Human Chest Wall and Assessment of the Mechanical Index for Lung Ultrasound.
    Patterson B; Miller DL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1442-1454. PubMed ID: 32217030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro classification of gallstones by quantitative echography.
    Goedegebure A; van der Steen AF; Thijssen JM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1992; 18(6-7):553-68. PubMed ID: 1413267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient and its frequency dependence in a polymer gel dosimeter.
    Crescenti RA; Bamber JC; Partridge M; Bush NL; Webb S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(22):6747-59. PubMed ID: 17975295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for Liver Disease. A Critical Appraisal of the Many Actors on the Stage.
    Piscaglia F; Salvatore V; Mulazzani L; Cantisani V; Schiavone C
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 26871407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Liver Steatosis Assessed by Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) Measured with the XL Probe of the FibroScan: A Pilot Study Assessing Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Sasso M; Audière S; Kemgang A; Gaouar F; Corpechot C; Chazouillères O; Fournier C; Golsztejn O; Prince S; Menu Y; Sandrin L; Miette V
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 42(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 26386476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating myocardial attenuation from M-mode ultrasonic backscatter.
    Baldwin SL; Marutyan KR; Yang M; Wallace KD; Holland MR; Miller JG
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 31(4):477-84. PubMed ID: 15831326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.