145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6400209)
1. [Comparison of the MPN technic with filtration in anaerobiosis in the determination of the number of coliform bacteria in various types of water].
Montacutelli R; Ricci N
Nuovi Ann Ig Microbiol; 1984; 35(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 6400209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Research on determination of fecal coliforms in water by use of high temperatures with the technic of fermentation in multiple tubes].
Macchia G; Mazzotti Fantasia M
Nuovi Ann Ig Microbiol; 1971; 22(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 4950584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Determination of fecal coliforms in water using membrane filtration--considerations and modifications of the technic].
Montacutelli R
Nuovi Ann Ig Microbiol; 1981; 32(5):327-49. PubMed ID: 7348299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The determination of total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria for quality control of bathing waters using the EC guideline 76/160 most probable number and BRILA-MUG broth].
Müller HE; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Havemeister G; Heinemeyer EA; Von Pritzbuer E
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 May; 189(6):543-53. PubMed ID: 2383351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of two media and different plating techniques for enumeration of thermotolerant coliforms in river water.
Tamagnini LM; González RD
Rev Latinoam Microbiol; 2001; 43(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 17061492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fermentation tube test statistics for direct water sampling and comments on the Thomas formula.
Nawalany M; Loga M
J Water Health; 2010 Sep; 8(3):431-7. PubMed ID: 20375472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distribution of indicator bacteria in Canyon Lake, California.
Davis K; Anderson MA; Yates MV
Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(7):1277-88. PubMed ID: 15862327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling the relationship between most probable number (MPN) and colony-forming unit (CFU) estimates of fecal coliform concentration.
Gronewold AD; Wolpert RL
Water Res; 2008 Jul; 42(13):3327-34. PubMed ID: 18490046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of elevated levels of coliform bacteria in a public water supply--Connecticut.
Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1985 Mar; 34(10):142-4. PubMed ID: 3919260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison between rapid detection method of enzyme substrate technique and multiple-tube fermentation technique in water coliform bacteria detection].
Sun ZK; Wu R; Ding P; Xue JR
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2006 Jul; 35(4):497-8. PubMed ID: 16986532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chlorine injury and the comparative performance of Colisure (TM), ColiLert (TM) and ColiQuik (TM) for the enumeration of coliform bacteria and E.coli in drinking water.
McFeters GA; Pyle BH; Gillis SJ; Acomb CJ; Ferrazza D
Water Sci Technol; 1993; 27(3-4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11537608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Bacteriologic studies of a sewage plant equipped with a biofiltration stage in Mannheim. 1. Determination of total pathogen numbers, gram-negative rod bacteria (except Salmonella), Enterococci and Staphylococcus aureus].
Dickgiesser N; Mersch-Sundermann V; Fischer C; Breuninger C
Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1988 Apr; 50(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 2969479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Study on the efficiency of four procedures for enumerating coliforms in water.
Dutkaand BJ; Tobin SE
Can J Microbiol; 1976 May; 22(5):630-5. PubMed ID: 776372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [On the coliform organisms and their count in water supply analysis (author's transl)].
Oger C; Gavini F; Delattre JM; Leclerc H
Ann Microbiol (Paris); 1981; 132(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 7235455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The use of the oxidase test in the hygienic-bacteriological analysis of water].
Daubner I; Mayer J
Arch Hyg Bakteriol; 1968 Aug; 152(4):302-5. PubMed ID: 4304061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Removal of fluoride, arsenic and coliform bacteria by modified homemade filter media from drinking water.
Devi R; Alemayehu E; Singh V; Kumar A; Mengistie E
Bioresour Technol; 2008 May; 99(7):2269-74. PubMed ID: 17596936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [On the use of Moore's swabs or mussels in the study of fecal pollution of sea water].
Bisbini P; Marinelli M; Marzot G; Tonelli E
Nuovi Ann Ig Microbiol; 1967; 18(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 4885182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative study of conventional and membrane-filtration technics in the microbiological analysis of surface waters].
de Marino Gómez-Sandoval MD; Marine Font A; Marcos Gallego P; García Moreno C
Rev Sanid Hig Publica (Madr); 1982; 56(9-10):999-1030. PubMed ID: 6765108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Bacteriological quality of Bendetti Lake (Santo Tomé, Santa Fe Province, Argentina) and associated environmental variables].
Emiliani F; González de Paira SM
Rev Argent Microbiol; 1998; 30(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 9629605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A membrane filter method for the demonstration of bacteria by the fluorescent antibody technique. 4. Experimental studies of the demonstration of Shigellae in water from various sources.
Danielsson D; Laurell G
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand; 1968; 72(2):251-62. PubMed ID: 4873630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
