These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6400238)
1. Aspects of the design of performance measuring test objects. McCarty K; Stewart W Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; Suppl 2():185-9. PubMed ID: 6400238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of ultrasound scanners by acoustic signal injection. Duggan TC; Sik MJ Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; Suppl 2():179-84. PubMed ID: 6400237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance measurements of manual and real-time scanners using a new tissue-mimicking phantom. Zagzebski JA; Madsen EL Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; Suppl 2():175-8. PubMed ID: 6400236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment. Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Results of a study of quality control of diagnostic ultrasound equipment]. Kollmann C Ultraschall Med; 1995 Oct; 16(5):206-9. PubMed ID: 8533069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonic medical imaging, current techniques and future developments. Berkhout AJ Med Prog Technol; 1986; 11(4):197-207. PubMed ID: 3543632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. B-scan texture classification: a study using physical and theoretical models. Nassiri DK; Nicholas D; Hill CR Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; Suppl 2():133-9. PubMed ID: 6400228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a sensitivity performance index test protocol and evaluation of colour Doppler sensitivity for a range of ultrasound scanners. Browne JE; Watson AJ; Hoskins PR; Elliott AT Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 30(11):1475-83. PubMed ID: 15588958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An ultrasound mini-balance for measurement of therapy level ultrasound. Sutton Y; McBride K; Pye S Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(14):3397-404. PubMed ID: 16825738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spectral variations in tissues and phantoms. Flax SW; Glover GH; Pelc NJ; Gutmann FD; McLachlan M Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; Suppl 2():127-31. PubMed ID: 6400227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Full modelling of the MOSAIC animal PET system based on the GATE Monte Carlo simulation code. Merheb C; Petegnief Y; Talbot JN Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):563-76. PubMed ID: 17228105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Empirical angle-dependent Biot and MBA models for acoustic anisotropy in cancellous bone. Lee KI; Hughes ER; Humphrey VF; Leighton TG; Choi MJ Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 17183128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the theoretical basis for an application of the nonlinear acoustics as a tool for tissue identification. Bjørnø ; Lewin PA Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; Suppl 2():167-71. PubMed ID: 6400235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Acoustic microscopy for tissue characterization. Kolosov O; Levin V; Mayev R; Marakuyeva I; Piruzyan L Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; Suppl 2():163-5. PubMed ID: 6400234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany]. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical acoustics of ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. Weninger K; Camara C; Putterman S Clin Plast Surg; 1999 Jul; 26(3):463-79, ix. PubMed ID: 10549444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo attenuation estimation in reflection mode. Fink M; Hottier F; Berger G; Perrin J Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; Suppl 2():117-22. PubMed ID: 6400225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]