These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6401089)

  • 1. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla ear canals: correlation with histopathology and suppression by external tones.
    Clark WW; Kim DO; Zurek PM; Bohne BA
    Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 16(3):299-314. PubMed ID: 6401089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears.
    Zurek PM; Clark WW; Kim DO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(3):774-80. PubMed ID: 7130536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of infrasound on cochlear damage from exposure to a 4 kHz octave band of noise.
    Harding GW; Bohne BA; Lee SC; Salt AN
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):128-38. PubMed ID: 17300889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distribution of focal lesions in the chinchilla organ of Corti following exposure to a 4-kHz or a 0.5-kHz octave band of noise.
    Harding GW; Bohne BA
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):50-9. PubMed ID: 17291699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Induction of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas from carboplatin-induced inner hair cell loss.
    Hofstetter P; Ding D; Salvi R
    Hear Res; 2000 Dec; 150(1-2):132-6. PubMed ID: 11077198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions created through the interaction of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and externally generated tones.
    Norrix LW; Glattke TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):945-55. PubMed ID: 8759948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Harrison WA; Burns EM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2649-58. PubMed ID: 8270741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intracochlear pressure in response to high intensity, low frequency sounds in chinchilla.
    Peacock J; Al Hussaini M; Greene NT; Tollin DJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():213-222. PubMed ID: 29945804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic distortion in the ear canal. I. Cubic difference tones: effects of acute noise injury.
    Schmiedt RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1481-90. PubMed ID: 3711447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Animal model for the 4-kHz tonal dip.
    Clark WW; Bohne BA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1978; 87(4 Pt 2 Suppl 51):1-16. PubMed ID: 100042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of AC and DC stimulation on chinchilla SOAE amplitude and frequency.
    Sun W; Ding D; Reyes S; Salvi RJ
    Hear Res; 2000 Dec; 150(1-2):137-48. PubMed ID: 11077199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Mott JB; Norton SJ; Neely ST; Warr WB
    Hear Res; 1989 Apr; 38(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 2708165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual consequences of the interactions between spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and external tones. I. Monaural diplacusis and aftertones.
    Long G
    Hear Res; 1998 May; 119(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 9641318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anatomical, behavioral, and electrophysiological observations on chinchillas after long exposures to noise.
    Eldredge DH; Mills JH; Bohne BA
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1973; 20():64-81. PubMed ID: 4575762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time course of organ of Corti degeneration after noise exposure.
    Bohne BA; Kimlinger M; Harding GW
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():158-169. PubMed ID: 27890677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
    Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of sympathetic fibers on noise-induced hearing loss in the chinchilla.
    Bielefeld EC; Henderson D
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):11-9. PubMed ID: 17092669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.
    Siegel JH; Kim DO; Molnar CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1982 Feb; 47(2):303-28. PubMed ID: 7062102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Pilka E; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 89():67-71. PubMed ID: 27619031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Energy reflectance in the ear canal can exceed unity near spontaneous otoacoustic emission frequencies.
    Burns EM; Keefe DH; Ling R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):462-74. PubMed ID: 9440333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.