These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6407327)

  • 21. Mass screening for neuroblastoma and estimation of costs.
    Nishi M; Miyake H; Takeda T; Takasugi N; Hanai J; Kawai T
    Acta Paediatr Scand; 1991; 80(8-9):812-7. PubMed ID: 1957600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diagnostic decision making.
    Antczak-Bouckoms A; Tulloch JF; Bouckoms AJ; Keith D; Lavori P
    Anesth Prog; 1990; 37(2-3):161-5. PubMed ID: 2085196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Methodology for performing mass prophylactic eye examinations in preschool institutions].
    Vatchenko AA; Timofeev NN; Drozdov AG; Ponurko NF
    Oftalmol Zh; 1986; (1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3703438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Value of a study of contrast sensitivity in the evaluation of visual function: applications to pathology and visual selection].
    Saraux H; Nordmann JP
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1990 Apr; 174(4):497-506; discussion 506-7. PubMed ID: 2249141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A mammoth vision screening--public relations and public service.
    Werner DL; Field S
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1982 Sep; 53(9):731-7. PubMed ID: 7130614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Use of the Arden grating test for screening.
    Weatherhead RG
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1980 Aug; 64(8):591-6. PubMed ID: 7426576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validity of vision screening tests by teachers among school children in Mashhad, Iran.
    OstadiMoghaddam H; Fotouhi A; Hashemi H; Yekta A; Heravian J; Ghalandarabadi M; Rezvan F; Jafarzadehpur E; Abdolahi-nia T; Khabazkhoob M
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 19(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 22568430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of vision screening by lay and professional personnel.
    Wick B; O'Neal M; Ricker P
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1976 Sep; 53(9 Pt 1):474-8. PubMed ID: 824956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How useful are contrast sensitivity charts in optometric practice? Case reports.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 May; 69(5):378-85. PubMed ID: 1594199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The application of medical decision making to the mass screening: the basic principles on ROC analysis].
    Tsji I
    Rinsho Byori; 1990 May; 38(5):597-600. PubMed ID: 2199711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fecal occult blood testing: clinical value and limitations.
    Simon JB
    Gastroenterologist; 1998 Mar; 6(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 9531118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Trade-offs in prenatal detection of Down syndrome.
    Serra-Prat M; Gallo P; Jovell AJ; Aymerich M; Estrada MD
    Am J Public Health; 1998 Apr; 88(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 9550991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Screening for disease: making evidence-based choices.
    Fields MM; Chevlen E
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2006 Feb; 10(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 16482730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Benefit-cost analysis of screening. A comparison of tests for gonorrhea.
    Goddeeris JH; Bronken TP
    Med Care; 1985 Nov; 23(11):1242-55. PubMed ID: 3934472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimating the cost effectiveness of screening tests.
    Torgerson DJ; Reid DM
    QJM; 1997 Oct; 90(10):649-52. PubMed ID: 9415348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of optometry vs digital photography screening for diabetic retinopathy in a single district.
    Tu KL; Palimar P; Sen S; Mathew P; Khaleeli A
    Eye (Lond); 2004 Jan; 18(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14707956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The application of a comprehensive visual screening programme to children aged 3-5 years. Can a modified procedure be devised for visual screening by ancillary staff?
    Dholakia S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 3454924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [How is ophthalmic undersupply demonstrated in socially disadvantaged people? Cross-sectional pilot investigation on the parametrisation of endpoints for patient-centred care research].
    Bestges BB; Lösche CC; Krummenauer F
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2013 Jul; 230(7):721-6. PubMed ID: 23877824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the predictive ability of the test-positive findings of an elementary school vision screening.
    Bailey RN
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Sep; 75(9):682-91. PubMed ID: 9778702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contrast sensitivity functions for clinical optometry.
    Comerford JP
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Jun; 50(6):683-6. PubMed ID: 479495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.