These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6411846)
1. Institutional review of medical research. Cost-benefit analysis, risk-benefit analysis, and "the possible effects of research on public policy". Schwartz RL J Leg Med; 1983 Jun; 4(2):143-66. PubMed ID: 6411846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. DHHS internal policies for reviewing research involving children. Reatig N IRB; 1981 Jan; 3(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11661894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Using the brain dead for medical research. Martyn SR Utah Law Rev; 1986; 1986(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 11651917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical and legal considerations in dental caries research involving human subjects. Branson R J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(Special Issue C):1214-364. PubMed ID: 11651755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Human experimentation: the review process in practice. Cowan DH Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An introduction to NBAC's report on research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity. Childress JF Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):101-15. PubMed ID: 11658169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies. Prentice ED; Gordon B IRB; 1997; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey. Katz J IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Institutional review boards. A net too thin. Palca J Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(3):4. PubMed ID: 8736666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Animal research: a call for legislative reform requiring ethical merit review. Brody M HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):423-84. PubMed ID: 11659214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Institutional review boards and public health research: an analysis. Hogue LL Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1978; 1(2):428-54. PubMed ID: 11661619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Testing drugs in pediatric populations: the FDA mandate. Tauer CA Account Res; 1999; 7(1):37-58. PubMed ID: 11657562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fears mount for gene scrutiny as watchdog faces axe. Kiernan V New Sci; 1996 Jun; 150(2033):10. PubMed ID: 11656540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1991 Jun; 56(117):28003-18. PubMed ID: 10112214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The development of policy guidelines governing human experimentation in the United States: a case study of public policy-making for science and technology. Frankel MS Ethics Sci Med; 1975 May; 2(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 765128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled. Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board. Levine C; Caplan AL IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]